- Drop the "Open design questions (Phase 1)" section — answered in docs/design.md. - Replace "Tech stack: TBD by inventor" with the actual stack (Go + pgx + html/template + HTMX, msupabase schema projax, Dokploy). - Replace "Worker preferences: inventor / coder shifts" with the current state (PRD landed, Phase 1 implementation underway, Phase 2 and 3 deferred per docs/design.md). - Point readers at docs/design.md as the live spec, and add a layout map so a fresh agent knows where each concern lives. No code touched; this is the last commit in the Phase 1 branch before merge to main per head's review (msg #1775).
66 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# projax — Project Instructions
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
Data backbone for m's complete self-management — projects (digital + physical + strategic + life themes), tasks, lifecycle, milestones. Multiple interfaces consume it. No interface is canonical; each is a view.
|
|
|
|
**Memory group_id:** `projax`
|
|
**Live spec:** `docs/design.md` (PRD, schema, migration plan, deferred phases)
|
|
|
|
## Architecture principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Model first, interfaces second.** The data model is the asset; UIs are replaceable.
|
|
2. **First-class non-code projects.** Greenhouse construction, household chores, career positioning, sport goals — same model as code projects.
|
|
3. **No CLI required.** m has explicitly opted out of CLI-first. Interfaces are visual / API / Otto-mediated.
|
|
4. **Subsumes existing scattered state.** mai.projects (adapter view today), Gitea issues, CalDAV tasks, mBrian topics. Migration not greenfield isolation.
|
|
5. **Otto is a consumer, not an owner.** Otto-PWA renders projax data; otto coordinates work *based on* projax; otto does not *define* projax.
|
|
|
|
## Tech stack (Phase 1)
|
|
|
|
- **Backend**: Go single binary. `pgx` for Postgres. `html/template` + HTMX (CDN), no JS build step. Static assets and migrations bundled with `embed`.
|
|
- **Database**: msupabase, schema `projax` (new). View `projax.items_unified` reads across `projax.*` + `mai.projects`. RLS off for v1 (single-user, Tailscale-only).
|
|
- **Hosting**: Dokploy on mlake, domain `projax.msbls.de`, Tailscale-only.
|
|
- **Tests**: `go test ./...` against `SUPABASE_DATABASE_URL` (skips when unset).
|
|
|
|
## Layout
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
cmd/projax/ main entrypoint (pool, migrate, serve)
|
|
db/ migrations (embedded) + runner + integration tests
|
|
store/ pgx-backed data access
|
|
web/ handlers, templates, static
|
|
deploy/dokploy.yaml reference manifest for projax.msbls.de
|
|
docs/design.md PRD — the source of truth for behaviour
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Branch strategy
|
|
|
|
- `main` = production-deployable
|
|
- `feat/*` / `fix/*` — short-lived
|
|
- No `dev` branch initially (small project)
|
|
- `--no-ff` merges to main
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
- **PRD landed** (`docs/design.md`, 2026-05-15) — schema, lifecycle, interface contracts settled.
|
|
- **Phase 1 underway**: schema + path trigger + adapter view + Go server + tree/detail/new/classify pages + Docker/Dokploy + README all on a feature branch.
|
|
- **Phase 2** (CalDAV + Gitea ingest) and **Phase 3** (Excalidraw / MCP / Otto-PWA) are scoped in `docs/design.md` but not started.
|
|
|
|
When a phase-1 follow-up surfaces (auth, hiding mai.projects test rows, mBrian topic-hub auto-link, …), file it against `docs/design.md` §8 first, then split into commits.
|
|
|
|
## Out of scope (still)
|
|
|
|
- Multi-user
|
|
- Mobile-first / responsive (desktop browser + Otto-PWA cover)
|
|
- Public exposure
|
|
- Generic SaaS-product instincts
|
|
- CLI surface (m has explicitly opted out)
|
|
|
|
## Refs
|
|
|
|
- `docs/design.md` — live spec (this is the source of truth)
|
|
- `mai.projects` schema (msupabase) — primary current state (read-only adapted via `projax.items_unified`)
|
|
- mBrian conventions (topic-hub pattern) — relevant for non-code project tracking, deferred to Phase 3
|
|
- otto session 2026-05-15 — inventory of where project data lives today, justifying this project's existence
|
|
- `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` § Git Strategy, Channel Routing, Memory Protocol
|