feat(deadlines): mig 138 backfill applies_to_target — Schadensbemessung (merits) + Bucheinsicht (order)

After Slice B1's Berufung unification (mig 134), the picker exposed five appeal targets but only three carried rules. Schadensbemessung and Bucheinsicht returned empty timelines. m's 2026-05-26 decision (#134): R.224 is uniform across substantive R.118 decisions, and R.220.2 / R.224.2.b / R.235.2 / R.237 / R.238.2 are uniform across the orders they appeal — so the existing merits-track and order-track rules can carry the missing targets via a non-destructive applies_to_target extension. Audit of live `paliad.deadline_rules` for upc.apl.unified (proceeding_type_id=160): - 7 endentscheidung rules → extend with 'schadensbemessung' - 7 anordnung rules → extend with 'bucheinsicht' - 2 kostenentscheidung rules — untouched (distinct leave-to-appeal track) Migration: - set_config('paliad.audit_reason', …) at top of UP and DOWN — required by the mig 079 deadline_rule_audit_trigger on every UPDATE. - Audit-first DO block lists every row to be touched (pre/post state) and RAISE EXCEPTIONs on pre-condition drift (missing proceeding_type, wrong rule counts, partial-run carry-over of the new targets). - Two narrow UPDATEs keyed off upc.apl.unified + existing target + absence of new target. - Post-sanity asserts schad=7, buch=7, end=7, anord=7, cost=2 — hard RAISE EXCEPTION on any drift. - DOWN strips both new targets via array_remove with the same WHERE. - No deadline_rules.updated_at writes; column exists but the migration is single-purpose and leaves it as-is. Dry-run via Supabase MCP confirmed: - UP yields {schad:7, buch:7, end:7, anord:7, cost:2} on prod. - DOWN restores {schad:0, buch:0, end:7, anord:7, cost:2}. - DB returned to pre-state; the real golang-migrate boot path will apply 138 cleanly at next deploy. Version bump 137→138: cronus's mig 137 (proceeding_role_labels, #132) merged to main while this branch was in flight. Rebased onto current main, renamed files, rewrote all "mig 137" references inside the SQL + test code. Test: - lookup_events_test.go: the schadensbemessung empty-result assertion becomes the inverse (rules expected). Adds a parallel bucheinsicht assertion. Same anchor-row shape check as the existing endentscheidung case (DepthFromAnchor=1, target ∈ AppliesToTarget, proceeding_type = upc.apl.unified). - `go test ./...` green post-rebase, including pkg/litigationplanner/ appeal_target_label_test.go added by cronus's mig 137. Refs: m/paliad#134, t-paliad-303. Lessons applied from mig 134 hotfixes: audit_reason set_config, no updated_at writes, audit live DB before drafting, RAISE EXCEPTION on integrity violations.
Merge: t-paliad-301 — Berufung tile UX: collapse side selectors + appeal-target trigger labels (mig 137) (m/paliad#132 )
2026-05-26 15:43:36 +02:00 · 2026-05-26 15:37:51 +02:00 · 2026-05-26 15:37:10 +02:00
13 changed files with 743 additions and 96 deletions
--- a/frontend/src/client/i18n.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/client/i18n.ts
@@ -462,10 +462,6 @@ const translations: Record<Lang, Record<string, string>> = {
    "deadlines.side.from_project": "Aus Akte:",
    "deadlines.side.override": "Andere Seite wählen",
    "deadlines.side.hint": "Wählen Sie eine Seite, um die Spalten zu fokussieren.",
-    "deadlines.appellant.label": "Berufung durch:",
-    "deadlines.appellant.claimant": "Klägerseite",
-    "deadlines.appellant.defendant": "Beklagtenseite",
-    "deadlines.appellant.none": "—",
    "deadlines.event.composite.label": "Zusammengesetzt:",
    "deadlines.event.unit.days.one": "Tag",
    "deadlines.event.unit.days.many": "Tage",
@@ -3567,10 +3563,6 @@ const translations: Record<Lang, Record<string, string>> = {
    "deadlines.side.from_project": "From case:",
    "deadlines.side.override": "Choose other side",
    "deadlines.side.hint": "Pick a side to focus the columns.",
-    "deadlines.appellant.label": "Appeal filed by:",
-    "deadlines.appellant.claimant": "Claimant",
-    "deadlines.appellant.defendant": "Defendant",
-    "deadlines.appellant.none": "—",
    "deadlines.event.composite.label": "Composite:",
    "deadlines.event.unit.days.one": "day",
    "deadlines.event.unit.days.many": "days",
--- a/frontend/src/client/verfahrensablauf.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/client/verfahrensablauf.ts
@@ -32,18 +32,20 @@ import {
 let selectedType = "";
 let lastResponse: DeadlineResponse | null = null;

-// Perspective state (t-paliad-250 / m/paliad#81). URL-driven so the
-// view is shareable and survives reload:
-//   ?side=claimant|defendant      → swaps which column owns the user's
-//                                    side (proactive vs reactive label).
-//                                    Default null = claimant-on-the-left.
-//   ?appellant=claimant|defendant → collapses party=both rows into the
-//                                    appellant's column (no mirror).
-//                                    Only meaningful for role-swap
-//                                    proceedings (Appeal etc.). Default
-//                                    null = legacy mirror behaviour.
+// Perspective state. URL-driven so the view is shareable + survives
+// reload:
+//   ?side=claimant|defendant — swaps which column owns the user's
+//                              side (proactive vs reactive label).
+//                              Default null = claimant-on-the-left.
+//
+// t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 collapsed the duplicate ?side= +
+// ?appellant= selectors into the single proactive-side picker above.
+// For role-swap proceedings (Appeal / EPA Opposition / DE Revision /
+// DPMA Appeal) the picker's labels swap to per-proceeding role
+// strings (Berufungskläger / Berufungsbeklagter, …) via ROLE_LABELS
+// below — but the underlying claimant/defendant value the engine
+// consumes is unchanged.
 let currentSide: Side = null;
-let currentAppellant: Side = null;

 // Project-driven auto-fill state (t-paliad-279 / m/paliad#111). When the
 // page is opened with ?project=<id> and that project has our_side set,
@@ -52,17 +54,13 @@ let currentAppellant: Side = null;
 // link, which clears this flag (radio cluster takes over again).
 let sidePrefilledFromProject = false;

-// Proceedings where one party initiates and "both" rows are role-swap
-// (i.e. either party files depending on who acted at the lower
-// instance). For these proceedings the appellant selector is meaningful
-// — when set, "both" rows collapse to a single row in the appellant's
-// column. For first-instance proceedings (Inf, Rev, …) the selector is
-// hidden because there's no appellant axis.
-//
-// Today: every upc.apl.* family member plus dpma.appeal.* and
-// de.inf.olg / de.inf.bgh / de.null.bgh (DE Berufung / Revision).
-// Conservative — false negatives just hide a control; false positives
-// would show an irrelevant control.
+// Role-swap proceedings — the side picker doubles as the appellant
+// axis. After t-paliad-301 collapsed the duplicate selectors, the
+// engine reads "appellant" from the single side value for these
+// proceedings (so a row with primary_party=both renders only in the
+// chosen side's column). For first-instance proceedings (Inf, Rev,
+// …) the side picker still narrows columns but doesn't collapse
+// the "both" rows.
 const APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
  "upc.apl.unified",
  "de.inf.olg",
@@ -73,6 +71,44 @@ const APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
  "epa.opp.boa",
 ]);

+// Per-proceeding role labels (t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 Bug A).
+// Mirrors paliad.proceeding_types.role_*_label_* — the canonical
+// definition lives in the DB; this map is the frontend's view of
+// it. Proceedings absent from the map fall back to the generic
+// "deadlines.side.claimant" / "deadlines.side.defendant" i18n keys.
+//
+// Keep in sync with mig 137's backfill. Adding a row here without a
+// matching DB row is fine (the DB col is NULL → still falls back to
+// default; UI shows the override). Adding to the DB without here
+// means the UI uses defaults — harmless but inconsistent.
+type RoleLabels = { proDE: string; reDE: string; proEN: string; reEN: string };
+const ROLE_LABELS: Record<string, RoleLabels> = {
+  "upc.apl.unified": {
+    proDE: "Berufungskläger",
+    reDE:  "Berufungsbeklagter",
+    proEN: "Appellant",
+    reEN:  "Appellee",
+  },
+  "upc.rev.cfi": {
+    proDE: "Antragsteller (Nichtigkeit)",
+    reDE:  "Antragsgegner (Nichtigkeit)",
+    proEN: "Revocation claimant",
+    reEN:  "Revocation defendant",
+  },
+  "epa.opp.opd": {
+    proDE: "Einsprechende(r)",
+    reDE:  "Patentinhaber(in)",
+    proEN: "Opponent",
+    reEN:  "Patentee",
+  },
+  "epa.opp.boa": {
+    proDE: "Einsprechende(r)",
+    reDE:  "Patentinhaber(in)",
+    proEN: "Opponent",
+    reEN:  "Patentee",
+  },
+};
+
 // Slice B1 (m/paliad#124 §18.1) — Berufung unification.
 // Proceedings that surface the appeal-target chip group. Currently
 // only the unified upc.apl proceeding; future variants (e.g. de.apl)
@@ -105,11 +141,6 @@ function readSideFromURL(): Side {
  return raw === "claimant" || raw === "defendant" ? raw : null;
 }

-function readAppellantFromURL(): Side {
-  const raw = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("appellant");
-  return raw === "claimant" || raw === "defendant" ? raw : null;
-}
-
 function writeSideToURL(s: Side) {
  const url = new URL(window.location.href);
  if (s === null) url.searchParams.delete("side");
@@ -117,11 +148,31 @@ function writeSideToURL(s: Side) {
  window.history.replaceState(null, "", url.pathname + (url.search ? url.search : "") + url.hash);
 }

-function writeAppellantToURL(a: Side) {
-  const url = new URL(window.location.href);
-  if (a === null) url.searchParams.delete("appellant");
-  else url.searchParams.set("appellant", a);
-  window.history.replaceState(null, "", url.pathname + (url.search ? url.search : "") + url.hash);
+// t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132: applies ROLE_LABELS to the side-row
+// radio labels for the currently selected proceeding. Proceedings
+// without an entry fall back to the existing
+// "deadlines.side.claimant" / "deadlines.side.defendant" i18n keys.
+function applyRoleLabels(proceedingType: string) {
+  const lang = getLang() === "en" ? "en" : "de";
+  const claimantSpan = document.querySelector<HTMLElement>(
+    "input[type=radio][name=side][value=claimant] + span"
+  );
+  const defendantSpan = document.querySelector<HTMLElement>(
+    "input[type=radio][name=side][value=defendant] + span"
+  );
+  if (!claimantSpan || !defendantSpan) return;
+
+  const labels = ROLE_LABELS[proceedingType];
+  if (labels) {
+    claimantSpan.textContent = lang === "en" ? labels.proEN : labels.proDE;
+    defendantSpan.textContent = lang === "en" ? labels.reEN : labels.reDE;
+  } else {
+    // Default — let i18n drive via data-i18n attribute. Reset to the
+    // canonical i18n value so a previous override doesn't stick when
+    // switching from upc.apl.unified back to upc.inf.cfi.
+    claimantSpan.textContent = t("deadlines.side.claimant");
+    defendantSpan.textContent = t("deadlines.side.defendant");
+  }
 }

 // Slice B1 — appeal-target URL state. Empty string = no target picked
@@ -432,7 +483,12 @@ function renderResults(data: DeadlineResponse) {
        editable: true,
        showNotes,
        side: currentSide,
-        appellant: hasAppellantAxis(selectedType) ? currentAppellant : null,
+        // t-paliad-301: the appellant axis collapses into the single
+        // side picker. For role-swap proceedings, currentSide IS the
+        // appellant pick (so a row with primary_party=both renders only
+        // in the picked side's column). For non-role-swap proceedings,
+        // the appellant axis is irrelevant — pass null.
+        appellant: hasAppellantAxis(selectedType) ? currentSide : null,
      })
    : renderTimelineBody(data, { showParty: true, editable: true, showNotes });

@@ -501,8 +557,8 @@ function selectProceeding(btn: HTMLButtonElement) {

  void populateCourtPicker("court-picker-row", "court-picker", selectedType);
  syncFlagRows();
-  syncAppellantRowVisibility();
  syncAppealTargetRowVisibility();
+  applyRoleLabels(selectedType);

  setProceedingPickerCollapsed(true, proceedingDisplayName(btn));

@@ -510,23 +566,6 @@ function selectProceeding(btn: HTMLButtonElement) {
  scheduleCalc(0);
 }

-// syncAppellantRowVisibility hides the appellant selector for
-// proceedings that have no appellant axis (first-instance Inf, Rev,
-// …). Clears the in-memory state and the URL param when hidden so a
-// shared link with ?appellant= doesn't leak into an unrelated
-// proceeding's render.
-function syncAppellantRowVisibility() {
-  const row = document.getElementById("appellant-row");
-  if (!row) return;
-  const visible = hasAppellantAxis(selectedType);
-  row.style.display = visible ? "" : "none";
-  if (!visible && currentAppellant !== null) {
-    currentAppellant = null;
-    writeAppellantToURL(null);
-    syncRadioGroup("appellant", "");
-  }
-}
-
 // Slice B1 (m/paliad#124 §18.1) — Berufung unification.
 // syncAppealTargetRowVisibility shows the appeal-target chip group
 // when the unified upc.apl Berufung tile is selected, hides it
@@ -727,10 +766,8 @@ function initViewToggle() {
 // projection of the last response, no backend involved.
 function initPerspectiveControls() {
  currentSide = readSideFromURL();
-  currentAppellant = readAppellantFromURL();
  currentAppealTarget = readAppealTargetFromURL();
  syncRadioGroup("side", currentSide ?? "");
-  syncRadioGroup("appellant", currentAppellant ?? "");
  syncRadioGroup("appeal-target", currentAppealTarget || "endentscheidung");
  syncSideHintVisibility();

@@ -745,16 +782,6 @@ function initPerspectiveControls() {
    });
  });

-  document.querySelectorAll<HTMLInputElement>("input[type=radio][name=appellant]").forEach((input) => {
-    input.addEventListener("change", () => {
-      if (!input.checked) return;
-      const v = input.value;
-      currentAppellant = (v === "claimant" || v === "defendant") ? v : null;
-      writeAppellantToURL(currentAppellant);
-      if (lastResponse) renderResults(lastResponse);
-    });
-  });
-
  // Slice B1 (m/paliad#124 §18.1) — appeal-target chip handler.
  // Each chip change re-fetches with the new target slug so the
  // timeline re-renders against the matching rule subset.
--- a/frontend/src/i18n-keys.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/i18n-keys.ts
@@ -1190,10 +1190,6 @@ export type I18nKey =
  | "deadlines.appeal_target.kostenentscheidung"
  | "deadlines.appeal_target.label"
  | "deadlines.appeal_target.schadensbemessung"
-  | "deadlines.appellant.claimant"
-  | "deadlines.appellant.defendant"
-  | "deadlines.appellant.label"
-  | "deadlines.appellant.none"
  | "deadlines.calculate"
  | "deadlines.card.calc.add_to_project"
  | "deadlines.card.calc.add_to_project.disabled"
--- a/frontend/src/verfahrensablauf.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/verfahrensablauf.tsx
@@ -250,23 +250,6 @@ export function renderVerfahrensablauf(): string {
                        </label>
                      </div>
                    </div>
-                    <div className="verfahrensablauf-perspective-row" id="appellant-row" style="display:none">
-                      <span className="date-label" data-i18n="deadlines.appellant.label">Berufung durch:</span>
-                      <div className="fristen-view-toggle" role="radiogroup" aria-label="Appellant">
-                        <label className="fristen-view-option">
-                          <input type="radio" name="appellant" value="claimant" />
-                          <span data-i18n="deadlines.appellant.claimant">Klägerseite</span>
-                        </label>
-                        <label className="fristen-view-option">
-                          <input type="radio" name="appellant" value="defendant" />
-                          <span data-i18n="deadlines.appellant.defendant">Beklagtenseite</span>
-                        </label>
-                        <label className="fristen-view-option">
-                          <input type="radio" name="appellant" value="" checked />
-                          <span data-i18n="deadlines.appellant.none">—</span>
-                        </label>
-                      </div>
-                    </div>
                    {/* Show-hidden toggle (t-paliad-290 / m/paliad#122).
                         Re-surfaces optional cards the user has previously
                         marked "Überspringen" via the per-card popover.
--- a/internal/db/migrations/137_proceeding_role_labels.down.sql
+++ b/internal/db/migrations/137_proceeding_role_labels.down.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+-- 137_proceeding_role_labels — DOWN
+--
+-- Drops the 4 role-label columns. Backfilled data is lost on
+-- down-migration; that's acceptable because the frontend renderer
+-- falls back to the default labels ("Klägerseite" / "Beklagtenseite")
+-- when the columns are absent.
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    DROP COLUMN IF EXISTS role_reactive_label_en;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    DROP COLUMN IF EXISTS role_reactive_label_de;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    DROP COLUMN IF EXISTS role_proactive_label_en;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    DROP COLUMN IF EXISTS role_proactive_label_de;
--- a/internal/db/migrations/137_proceeding_role_labels.up.sql
+++ b/internal/db/migrations/137_proceeding_role_labels.up.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+-- 137_proceeding_role_labels — t-paliad-301, m/paliad#132
+--
+-- Bug A fix: per-proceeding role labels so the Verfahrensablauf side
+-- selector can render "Berufungskläger / Berufungsbeklagter" for the
+-- unified UPC Berufung tile instead of the generic "Klägerseite /
+-- Beklagtenseite".
+--
+-- Four new optional columns on paliad.proceeding_types. NULL on a
+-- column falls back to the language-default ("Klägerseite" / "Claimant
+-- side" / "Beklagtenseite" / "Defendant side") in the frontend renderer.
+-- Only the proceedings whose role-naming actually differs get a backfill.
+--
+-- Live-DB audit (mcp__supabase__execute_sql) before drafting:
+--   - paliad.proceeding_types has 14 columns; the 4 target columns do
+--     NOT exist (zero name collisions).
+--   - Zero triggers on paliad.proceeding_types. No audit_reason
+--     setup needed.
+--   - No updated_at / created_at on the table — DO NOT include
+--     timestamp UPDATEs (lesson from mig 134 HOTFIX 3).
+--
+-- ADDITIVE ONLY. ALTER + UPDATE statements; no CHECK constraints
+-- (the columns are free-text labels, validated at the application layer).
+-- Down migration drops the 4 columns.
+--
+-- See m/paliad#132 for the full design rationale + the role-label
+-- matrix per proceeding code.
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 1. Schema additions
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    ADD COLUMN role_proactive_label_de text NULL;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    ADD COLUMN role_proactive_label_en text NULL;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    ADD COLUMN role_reactive_label_de text NULL;
+
+ALTER TABLE paliad.proceeding_types
+    ADD COLUMN role_reactive_label_en text NULL;
+
+COMMENT ON COLUMN paliad.proceeding_types.role_proactive_label_de IS
+    'DE label for the proactive (claimant-equivalent) side of this '
+    'proceeding. NULL = renderer falls back to "Klägerseite". '
+    't-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 Bug A.';
+COMMENT ON COLUMN paliad.proceeding_types.role_proactive_label_en IS
+    'EN label for the proactive side. NULL = "Claimant side".';
+COMMENT ON COLUMN paliad.proceeding_types.role_reactive_label_de IS
+    'DE label for the reactive (defendant-equivalent) side. NULL = '
+    '"Beklagtenseite".';
+COMMENT ON COLUMN paliad.proceeding_types.role_reactive_label_en IS
+    'EN label for the reactive side. NULL = "Defendant side".';
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 2. Audit-first NOTICE pass.
+--
+-- Lists which proceeding_types are about to receive a backfill so
+-- the operator sees the scope before the UPDATE fires. NULL columns
+-- on every other row stay NULL (the frontend falls back to defaults).
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+DO $$
+DECLARE
+    rec record;
+    backfill_count int := 0;
+BEGIN
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] Proceedings that will receive role-label backfill:';
+    FOR rec IN
+        SELECT code, name
+          FROM paliad.proceeding_types
+         WHERE code IN ('upc.apl.unified', 'upc.rev.cfi', 'epa.opp.opd', 'epa.opp.boa')
+         ORDER BY code
+    LOOP
+        RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137]   %  %', rec.code, rec.name;
+        backfill_count := backfill_count + 1;
+    END LOOP;
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] Total: % proceedings (others stay NULL → renderer default)', backfill_count;
+END $$;
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 3. Backfill.
+--
+-- Per the design matrix in m/paliad#132:
+--   - upc.apl.unified → Berufungskläger / Berufungsbeklagter / Appellant / Appellee
+--   - upc.rev.cfi     → Antragsteller (Nichtigkeit) / Antragsgegner (Nichtigkeit) /
+--                       Revocation claimant / Revocation defendant
+--   - epa.opp.opd     → Einsprechende(r) / Patentinhaber(in) /
+--                       Opponent / Patentee
+--   - epa.opp.boa     → Einsprechende(r) / Patentinhaber(in) /
+--                       Opponent / Patentee
+--   - (others)        → stay NULL → frontend defaults
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+UPDATE paliad.proceeding_types
+   SET role_proactive_label_de = 'Berufungskläger',
+       role_reactive_label_de  = 'Berufungsbeklagter',
+       role_proactive_label_en = 'Appellant',
+       role_reactive_label_en  = 'Appellee'
+ WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified';
+
+UPDATE paliad.proceeding_types
+   SET role_proactive_label_de = 'Antragsteller (Nichtigkeit)',
+       role_reactive_label_de  = 'Antragsgegner (Nichtigkeit)',
+       role_proactive_label_en = 'Revocation claimant',
+       role_reactive_label_en  = 'Revocation defendant'
+ WHERE code = 'upc.rev.cfi';
+
+UPDATE paliad.proceeding_types
+   SET role_proactive_label_de = 'Einsprechende(r)',
+       role_reactive_label_de  = 'Patentinhaber(in)',
+       role_proactive_label_en = 'Opponent',
+       role_reactive_label_en  = 'Patentee'
+ WHERE code IN ('epa.opp.opd', 'epa.opp.boa');
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 4. Post-migration NOTICE — informational only.
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+DO $$
+DECLARE
+    rec record;
+BEGIN
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] post: backfilled role-label distribution:';
+    FOR rec IN
+        SELECT code,
+               role_proactive_label_de,
+               role_reactive_label_de
+          FROM paliad.proceeding_types
+         WHERE role_proactive_label_de IS NOT NULL
+         ORDER BY code
+    LOOP
+        RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137]   %  proactive=%  reactive=%',
+            rec.code, rec.role_proactive_label_de, rec.role_reactive_label_de;
+    END LOOP;
+END $$;
--- a/internal/db/migrations/138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order.down.sql
+++ b/internal/db/migrations/138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order.down.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+-- 138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order DOWN — t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134
+--
+-- Removes 'schadensbemessung' from the merits-track rules and
+-- 'bucheinsicht' from the order-track rules, restoring the pre-137
+-- shape (endentscheidung-only / anordnung-only / kostenentscheidung-only).
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 0. Audit reason (required by mig 079 trigger for any UPDATE on
+--    paliad.deadline_rules).
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+SELECT set_config(
+    'paliad.audit_reason',
+    'mig 138 DOWN: t-paliad-303 — strip Schadensbemessung/Bucheinsicht from applies_to_target per m/paliad#134',
+    true);
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 1. Strip new targets via array_remove.
+--
+-- WHERE clauses pinned to upc.apl.unified to avoid touching unrelated
+-- rules that might have been added later under other proceeding types.
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+-- 1a. Remove schadensbemessung from merits-track rows.
+UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
+   SET applies_to_target = array_remove(dr.applies_to_target, 'schadensbemessung')
+  FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
+ WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+   AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+   AND dr.is_active = true
+   AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+
+-- 1b. Remove bucheinsicht from order-track rows.
+UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
+   SET applies_to_target = array_remove(dr.applies_to_target, 'bucheinsicht')
+  FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
+ WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+   AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+   AND dr.is_active = true
+   AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 2. Sanity check — no row may carry the new targets after the down.
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+DO $$
+DECLARE
+    schad_left int;
+    buch_left int;
+BEGIN
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_left
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_left
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+
+    IF schad_left > 0 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138 DOWN] FAILED — % rows still carry schadensbemessung', schad_left;
+    END IF;
+    IF buch_left > 0 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138 DOWN] FAILED — % rows still carry bucheinsicht', buch_left;
+    END IF;
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138 DOWN] stripped schadensbemessung + bucheinsicht from upc.apl.unified rules';
+END $$;
--- a/internal/db/migrations/138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order.up.sql
+++ b/internal/db/migrations/138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order.up.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+-- 138_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order — t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134
+--
+-- Slice B1 (mig 134) introduced the unified upc.apl.unified proceeding type
+-- with 5 appeal_target enum values: endentscheidung, kostenentscheidung,
+-- anordnung, schadensbemessung, bucheinsicht. The first three each carry
+-- rules; schadensbemessung and bucheinsicht returned an empty timeline
+-- because no rules referenced them yet.
+--
+-- m's 2026-05-26 decision (#134): extend applies_to_target on the existing
+-- rules — Schadensbemessung := merits track (R.224 anchored on R.118
+-- substantive decisions), Bucheinsicht := order track (R.220.2 +
+-- R.224.2.b + R.235.2 + R.237 + R.238.2 etc.). Legal premise verified
+-- against the 16 live rules — every endentscheidung rule is a generic
+-- R.224 merits step, every anordnung rule is a generic R.220/224/235/237/
+-- 238 order step. No rule carries content specific to a particular kind
+-- of underlying decision/order. Audit on the comment trail of #134.
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 0. Audit reason (required by mig 079 trigger for any UPDATE on
+--    paliad.deadline_rules — both UPDATEs below trigger it).
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+SELECT set_config(
+    'paliad.audit_reason',
+    'mig 138: t-paliad-303 — extend applies_to_target for Schadensbemessung (merits) + Bucheinsicht (order) per m/paliad#134',
+    true);
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 1. Audit-first DO block.
+--
+-- Resolve upc.apl.unified, count the rows we are about to touch, and
+-- RAISE EXCEPTION if anything looks wrong (proceeding type missing,
+-- merits/order rule counts off, or a rule already carries the new
+-- target — which would mean an earlier partial run).
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+DO $$
+DECLARE
+    rec record;
+    upc_apl_id int;
+    merits_count int;
+    order_count int;
+    schad_already int;
+    buch_already int;
+BEGIN
+    SELECT id INTO upc_apl_id
+      FROM paliad.proceeding_types
+     WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified';
+    IF upc_apl_id IS NULL THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] upc.apl.unified proceeding_type not found — mig 134 must run first';
+    END IF;
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] upc.apl.unified proceeding_type_id = %', upc_apl_id;
+
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO merits_count
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules
+     WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+       AND is_active = true
+       AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO order_count
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules
+     WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+       AND is_active = true
+       AND 'anordnung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
+
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] live counts: endentscheidung=% anordnung=%', merits_count, order_count;
+    IF merits_count <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] expected 7 endentscheidung rules under upc.apl.unified, got %', merits_count;
+    END IF;
+    IF order_count <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] expected 7 anordnung rules under upc.apl.unified, got %', order_count;
+    END IF;
+
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_already
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules
+     WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+       AND is_active = true
+       AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_already
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules
+     WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+       AND is_active = true
+       AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(applies_to_target);
+    IF schad_already > 0 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] % rules already carry schadensbemessung — partial run?', schad_already;
+    END IF;
+    IF buch_already > 0 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] % rules already carry bucheinsicht — partial run?', buch_already;
+    END IF;
+
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] rules to extend with schadensbemessung (merits track):';
+    FOR rec IN
+        SELECT dr.id, dr.rule_code, dr.legal_source, dr.name, dr.applies_to_target
+          FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+         WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+           AND dr.is_active = true
+           AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
+         ORDER BY dr.sequence_order, dr.rule_code NULLS LAST
+    LOOP
+        RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138]   merits  %  %  %  pre=%  →  post=%',
+            COALESCE(rec.rule_code, '(no-code)'),
+            COALESCE(rec.legal_source, '(no-source)'),
+            rec.name,
+            rec.applies_to_target,
+            rec.applies_to_target || 'schadensbemessung'::text;
+    END LOOP;
+
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] rules to extend with bucheinsicht (order track):';
+    FOR rec IN
+        SELECT dr.id, dr.rule_code, dr.legal_source, dr.name, dr.applies_to_target
+          FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+         WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
+           AND dr.is_active = true
+           AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
+         ORDER BY dr.sequence_order, dr.rule_code NULLS LAST
+    LOOP
+        RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138]   order   %  %  %  pre=%  →  post=%',
+            COALESCE(rec.rule_code, '(no-code)'),
+            COALESCE(rec.legal_source, '(no-source)'),
+            rec.name,
+            rec.applies_to_target,
+            rec.applies_to_target || 'bucheinsicht'::text;
+    END LOOP;
+END $$;
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 2. Extend applies_to_target.
+--
+-- Narrow WHERE clauses key off upc.apl.unified + existing target +
+-- absence of new target, so the UPDATEs are idempotent in spirit
+-- (the audit block above already RAISE EXCEPTIONed if any row
+-- already had the new value).
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+-- 2a. Schadensbemessung := merits track (7 rules expected).
+UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
+   SET applies_to_target = applies_to_target || 'schadensbemessung'::text
+  FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
+ WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+   AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+   AND dr.is_active = true
+   AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
+   AND NOT ('schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target));
+
+-- 2b. Bucheinsicht := order track (7 rules expected).
+UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
+   SET applies_to_target = applies_to_target || 'bucheinsicht'::text
+  FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
+ WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+   AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+   AND dr.is_active = true
+   AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
+   AND NOT ('bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target));
+
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+-- 3. Post-migration sanity check.
+--
+-- Hard-fail on any divergence: the two new targets must each cover
+-- 7 rules, the original three targets must be unchanged in count,
+-- and no rule has lost its prior target.
+-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+DO $$
+DECLARE
+    schad_post int;
+    buch_post int;
+    end_post int;
+    anord_post int;
+    cost_post int;
+    target_distribution record;
+BEGIN
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_post
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_post
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO end_post
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO anord_post
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO cost_post
+      FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+      JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
+       AND dr.is_active = true
+       AND 'kostenentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
+
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] post: schadensbemessung=%  bucheinsicht=%  endentscheidung=%  anordnung=%  kostenentscheidung=%',
+        schad_post, buch_post, end_post, anord_post, cost_post;
+
+    IF schad_post <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] FAILED — expected 7 schadensbemessung rules, got %', schad_post;
+    END IF;
+    IF buch_post <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] FAILED — expected 7 bucheinsicht rules, got %', buch_post;
+    END IF;
+    IF end_post <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] FAILED — endentscheidung count drifted: expected 7, got %', end_post;
+    END IF;
+    IF anord_post <> 7 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] FAILED — anordnung count drifted: expected 7, got %', anord_post;
+    END IF;
+    IF cost_post <> 2 THEN
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 138] FAILED — kostenentscheidung count drifted: expected 2, got %', cost_post;
+    END IF;
+
+    FOR target_distribution IN
+        SELECT unnest(applies_to_target) AS target, COUNT(*) AS n
+          FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
+          JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
+         WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified' AND dr.is_active = true
+         GROUP BY unnest(applies_to_target)
+         ORDER BY 1
+    LOOP
+        RAISE NOTICE '[mig 138] post: applies_to_target=%  count=%',
+            target_distribution.target, target_distribution.n;
+    END LOOP;
+END $$;
--- a/internal/services/deadline_rule_service.go
+++ b/internal/services/deadline_rule_service.go
@@ -40,7 +40,9 @@ const ruleColumns = `id, proceeding_type_id, parent_id, submission_code, name, n
 const proceedingTypeColumns = `id, code, name, name_en, description, jurisdiction,
 	category, default_color, sort_order, is_active,
 	trigger_event_label_de, trigger_event_label_en,
-	appeal_target`
+	appeal_target,
+	role_proactive_label_de, role_proactive_label_en,
+	role_reactive_label_de,  role_reactive_label_en`

 // List returns active rules, optionally filtered by proceeding type.
 // Each row has ConceptDefaultEventTypeID hydrated from
--- a/internal/services/lookup_events_test.go
+++ b/internal/services/lookup_events_test.go
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ func TestLookupEvents(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	})

-	t.Run("appeal_target=schadensbemessung returns empty (no rules seeded yet)", func(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Run("appeal_target=schadensbemessung returns upc.apl merits rules (mig 138 backfill)", func(t *testing.T) {
 		matches, err := catalog.LookupEvents(ctx, lp.EventLookupAxes{
 			Jurisdiction: "UPC",
 			AppealTarget: lp.AppealTargetSchadensbemessung,
@@ -152,8 +152,68 @@ func TestLookupEvents(t *testing.T) {
 		if err != nil {
 			t.Fatalf("LookupEvents: %v", err)
 		}
-		if len(matches) != 0 {
-			t.Errorf("schadensbemessung should be empty until rules seeded; got %d rows", len(matches))
+		// mig 138 (t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134) extends the 7 merits-track
+		// rules under upc.apl.unified with applies_to_target ⊇ {schadensbemessung}
+		// because R.224 is uniform across substantive R.118 decisions.
+		if len(matches) == 0 {
+			t.Fatal("expected upc.apl schadensbemessung rules after mig 138 backfill")
+		}
+		for _, m := range matches {
+			if m.DepthFromAnchor != 1 {
+				continue
+			}
+			found := false
+			for _, t := range m.Rule.AppliesToTarget {
+				if t == lp.AppealTargetSchadensbemessung {
+					found = true
+					break
+				}
+			}
+			if !found {
+				t.Errorf("anchor row %s missing schadensbemessung target: %v",
+					m.Rule.Name, m.Rule.AppliesToTarget)
+			}
+			if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl.unified" {
+				t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl.unified",
+					m.Rule.Name, m.ProceedingType.Code)
+			}
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("appeal_target=bucheinsicht returns upc.apl order rules (mig 138 backfill)", func(t *testing.T) {
+		matches, err := catalog.LookupEvents(ctx, lp.EventLookupAxes{
+			Jurisdiction: "UPC",
+			AppealTarget: lp.AppealTargetBucheinsicht,
+		}, lp.EventLookupDepthAllFollowing)
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("LookupEvents: %v", err)
+		}
+		// mig 138 (t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134) extends the 7 order-track
+		// rules under upc.apl.unified with applies_to_target ⊇ {bucheinsicht}
+		// because R.220.2 / R.224.2.b / R.235.2 / R.237 / R.238.2 are
+		// uniform across the orders they appeal.
+		if len(matches) == 0 {
+			t.Fatal("expected upc.apl bucheinsicht rules after mig 138 backfill")
+		}
+		for _, m := range matches {
+			if m.DepthFromAnchor != 1 {
+				continue
+			}
+			found := false
+			for _, t := range m.Rule.AppliesToTarget {
+				if t == lp.AppealTargetBucheinsicht {
+					found = true
+					break
+				}
+			}
+			if !found {
+				t.Errorf("anchor row %s missing bucheinsicht target: %v",
+					m.Rule.Name, m.Rule.AppliesToTarget)
+			}
+			if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl.unified" {
+				t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl.unified",
+					m.Rule.Name, m.ProceedingType.Code)
+			}
 		}
 	})
 }
--- a/pkg/litigationplanner/appeal_target_label_test.go
+++ b/pkg/litigationplanner/appeal_target_label_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+package litigationplanner
+
+import "testing"
+
+// TestTriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget pins the per-target trigger-
+// event label matrix (t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 Bug B). The 5
+// canonical AppealTargets each have a DE + EN label; unknown targets
+// return empty so the caller can fall back to the proceeding's own
+// trigger_event_label.
+func TestTriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		target string
+		lang   string
+		want   string
+	}{
+		{AppealTargetEndentscheidung, "de", "Endentscheidung (R.118)"},
+		{AppealTargetEndentscheidung, "en", "Final decision (R.118)"},
+		{AppealTargetKostenentscheidung, "de", "Kostenentscheidung"},
+		{AppealTargetKostenentscheidung, "en", "Cost decision"},
+		{AppealTargetAnordnung, "de", "Anordnung"},
+		{AppealTargetAnordnung, "en", "Order"},
+		{AppealTargetSchadensbemessung, "de", "Entscheidung im Schadensbemessungsverfahren"},
+		{AppealTargetSchadensbemessung, "en", "Damages-assessment decision"},
+		{AppealTargetBucheinsicht, "de", "Anordnung der Bucheinsicht"},
+		{AppealTargetBucheinsicht, "en", "Book-inspection order"},
+		// Unknown lang falls through to DE so the caller never gets
+		// an empty string for a known target.
+		{AppealTargetEndentscheidung, "fr", "Endentscheidung (R.118)"},
+		// Unknown target → empty so caller falls back to proceeding's
+		// trigger_event_label.
+		{"", "de", ""},
+		{"foo", "en", ""},
+	}
+	for _, c := range cases {
+		if got := TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(c.target, c.lang); got != c.want {
+			t.Errorf("TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(%q, %q) = %q, want %q",
+				c.target, c.lang, got, c.want)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+// TestAppealTargetsCoverage ensures every entry in AppealTargets has
+// a non-empty label in both languages. Adding a target to the slice
+// without populating the switch would silently emit empty labels —
+// this test catches that.
+func TestAppealTargetsCoverage(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, target := range AppealTargets {
+		for _, lang := range []string{"de", "en"} {
+			if got := TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(target, lang); got == "" {
+				t.Errorf("AppealTarget %q has empty label for lang %q — add it to the switch",
+					target, lang)
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
--- a/pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go
+++ b/pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go
@@ -571,6 +571,21 @@ func Calculate(
 	if pickedProceeding.TriggerEventLabelEN != nil {
 		resp.TriggerEventLabelEN = *pickedProceeding.TriggerEventLabelEN
 	}
+	// t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 Bug B — appeal_target-driven trigger
+	// label. When the request narrows to a specific appeal target, the
+	// "Auslösendes Ereignis" label describes the underlying decision
+	// (Endentscheidung / Kostenentscheidung / Anordnung /
+	// Schadensbemessung / Bucheinsicht) rather than the appeal
+	// proceeding itself. Overrides the proceeding's own
+	// trigger_event_label set above.
+	if opts.AppealTarget != "" {
+		if de := TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(opts.AppealTarget, "de"); de != "" {
+			resp.TriggerEventLabel = de
+		}
+		if en := TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(opts.AppealTarget, "en"); en != "" {
+			resp.TriggerEventLabelEN = en
+		}
+	}
 	if hasSubTrackNote {
 		resp.ContextualNote = subTrackNote.NoteDE
 		resp.ContextualNoteEN = subTrackNote.NoteEN
--- a/pkg/litigationplanner/types.go
+++ b/pkg/litigationplanner/types.go
@@ -185,6 +185,65 @@ type ProceedingType struct {
 	// — today the unified upc.apl row has this NULL (per-rule targets
 	// live on Rule.AppliesToTarget).
 	AppealTarget *string `db:"appeal_target" json:"appeal_target,omitempty"`
+
+	// Role label overrides (t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132, mig 137).
+	// NULL = renderer falls back to the language-default labels
+	// ("Klägerseite" / "Beklagtenseite" / "Claimant side" / "Defendant side").
+	// Set on proceedings where the role-naming diverges from the
+	// claimant/defendant default (Appeal → Berufungskläger /
+	// Berufungsbeklagter; Revocation → Antragsteller /
+	// Antragsgegner Nichtigkeit; EPA Opposition → Einsprechende(r) /
+	// Patentinhaber(in)).
+	RoleProactiveLabelDE *string `db:"role_proactive_label_de" json:"role_proactive_label_de,omitempty"`
+	RoleProactiveLabelEN *string `db:"role_proactive_label_en" json:"role_proactive_label_en,omitempty"`
+	RoleReactiveLabelDE  *string `db:"role_reactive_label_de"  json:"role_reactive_label_de,omitempty"`
+	RoleReactiveLabelEN  *string `db:"role_reactive_label_en"  json:"role_reactive_label_en,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget returns the per-target
+// "Auslösendes Ereignis" label for the unified UPC Berufung
+// proceeding (t-paliad-301 / m/paliad#132 Bug B). The trigger event
+// for an appeal is the underlying decision, not the appeal
+// proceeding itself — these labels override the proceeding's own
+// trigger_event_label when appeal_target is set.
+//
+// lang ∈ {"de", "en"}; any other value falls through to "de" so the
+// caller never gets an empty string.
+//
+// Returns empty when target is empty / unknown (caller must fall
+// back to the proceeding's own trigger_event_label).
+func TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(target, lang string) string {
+	if lang != "en" {
+		lang = "de"
+	}
+	switch target {
+	case AppealTargetEndentscheidung:
+		if lang == "en" {
+			return "Final decision (R.118)"
+		}
+		return "Endentscheidung (R.118)"
+	case AppealTargetKostenentscheidung:
+		if lang == "en" {
+			return "Cost decision"
+		}
+		return "Kostenentscheidung"
+	case AppealTargetAnordnung:
+		if lang == "en" {
+			return "Order"
+		}
+		return "Anordnung"
+	case AppealTargetSchadensbemessung:
+		if lang == "en" {
+			return "Damages-assessment decision"
+		}
+		return "Entscheidung im Schadensbemessungsverfahren"
+	case AppealTargetBucheinsicht:
+		if lang == "en" {
+			return "Book-inspection order"
+		}
+		return "Anordnung der Bucheinsicht"
+	}
+	return ""
 }

 // AdjustmentReason describes why a date was rolled forward / backward