fix(litigationplanner): rename upc.apl → upc.apl.unified (HOTFIX, t-paliad-299, m/paliad#130)

mig 134 was inserting code='upc.apl' (2 segments) into paliad.proceeding_types,
which carries paliad_proceeding_code_shape CHECK requiring 3 dot-segments OR
'^_archived_'. Every container restart hit the constraint, rolled the migration
TXN back, and crash-looped paliad.de.

Rename the unified Berufung code to 'upc.apl.unified' (3 segments, satisfies the
constraint, preserves design intent). The pre-existing constraint is a useful
jurisdiction.category.specific invariant — keep it, fix the new row.

Touched only string literals:
- mig 134 up.sql + down.sql (insert, lookups, post-checks)
- frontend/src/verfahrensablauf.tsx (UPC_TYPES code + i18nKey)
- frontend/src/client/verfahrensablauf.ts (APPELLANT_AXIS + APPEAL_TARGET sets)
- frontend/src/client/i18n.ts (DE + EN translation rows)
- frontend/src/i18n-keys.ts (auto-regen via bun build)
- internal/services/lookup_events_test.go (anchor-row assertion)

Verified: `grep -rn "'upc\.apl'\|\"upc\.apl\""` returns zero hits.
go build, bun run build, go test ./... all green.

frontend/src/client/i18n.ts

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ const translations: Record<Lang, Record<string, string>> = {
     "deadlines.upc.disc.cfi": "Bucheinsicht",
     "deadlines.upc.apl.cost": "Berufung Kosten",
     "deadlines.upc.apl.order": "Berufung Anordnungen",
-    "deadlines.upc.apl": "Berufung",
+    "deadlines.upc.apl.unified": "Berufung",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.label": "Worauf richtet sich die Berufung?",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.endentscheidung": "Endentscheidung",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.kostenentscheidung": "Kostenentscheidung",
@@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@ const translations: Record<Lang, Record<string, string>> = {
     "deadlines.upc.dmgs.cfi": "Damages Determination",
     "deadlines.upc.disc.cfi": "Lay-open Books",
     "deadlines.upc.apl.cost": "Cost-Decision Appeal",
-    "deadlines.upc.apl": "Appeal",
+    "deadlines.upc.apl.unified": "Appeal",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.label": "Appeal against:",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.endentscheidung": "Final Decision",
     "deadlines.appeal_target.kostenentscheidung": "Cost Decision",

frontend/src/client/verfahrensablauf.ts

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ let sidePrefilledFromProject = false;
 // Conservative — false negatives just hide a control; false positives
 // would show an irrelevant control.
 const APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
-  "upc.apl",
+  "upc.apl.unified",
   "de.inf.olg",
   "de.inf.bgh",
   "de.null.bgh",
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ const APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
 // only the unified upc.apl proceeding; future variants (e.g. de.apl)
 // can opt in by adding the code here.
 const APPEAL_TARGET_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
-  "upc.apl",
+  "upc.apl.unified",
 ]);
 
 // Five canonical appeal-target slugs (lp.AppealTargets — keep ordered

frontend/src/i18n-keys.ts

@@ -1517,10 +1517,10 @@ export type I18nKey =
   | "deadlines.trigger.label"
   | "deadlines.unavailable"
   | "deadlines.upc"
-  | "deadlines.upc.apl"
   | "deadlines.upc.apl.cost"
   | "deadlines.upc.apl.merits"
   | "deadlines.upc.apl.order"
+  | "deadlines.upc.apl.unified"
   | "deadlines.upc.ccr.cfi"
   | "deadlines.upc.disc.cfi"
   | "deadlines.upc.dmgs.cfi"

frontend/src/verfahrensablauf.tsx

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ const UPC_TYPES: ProceedingDef[] = [
   { code: "upc.rev.cfi",    i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.rev.cfi",    name: "Nichtigkeitsklage" },
   { code: "upc.ccr.cfi",    i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.ccr.cfi",    name: "Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit" },
   { code: "upc.pi.cfi",     i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.pi.cfi",     name: "Einstw. Maßnahmen" },
-  { code: "upc.apl",        i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.apl",        name: "Berufung" },
+  { code: "upc.apl.unified", i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.apl.unified", name: "Berufung" },
   { code: "upc.dmgs.cfi",   i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.dmgs.cfi",   name: "Schadensbemessung" },
   { code: "upc.disc.cfi",   i18nKey: "deadlines.upc.disc.cfi",   name: "Bucheinsicht" },
 ];

internal/db/migrations/134_berufung_unification.down.sql

@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
  WHERE dr.applies_to_target = ARRAY['anordnung']::text[];
 
 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
--- 3. Drop the unified upc.apl row (now orphaned).
+-- 3. Drop the unified upc.apl.unified row (now orphaned).
 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 
-DELETE FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'upc.apl';
+DELETE FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified';
 
 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 -- 4. Drop the new columns + their CHECK constraints.

internal/db/migrations/134_berufung_unification.up.sql

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ INSERT INTO paliad.proceeding_types (
     appeal_target
 )
 SELECT
-    'upc.apl',
+    'upc.apl.unified',
     'Berufungsverfahren',
     'Appeal',
     'Vereinheitlichtes Berufungsverfahren — wählen Sie anschließend, '
@@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ DECLARE
 BEGIN
     SELECT id INTO upc_apl_id
       FROM paliad.proceeding_types
-     WHERE code = 'upc.apl';
-    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] new upc.apl proceeding_type_id = %', upc_apl_id;
+     WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified';
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] new upc.apl.unified proceeding_type_id = %', upc_apl_id;
 
-    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] Rules to reassign to upc.apl with applies_to_target:';
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] Rules to reassign to upc.apl.unified with applies_to_target:';
     FOR rec IN
         SELECT dr.id AS rule_id,
                pt.code AS old_proceeding,
@@ -185,10 +185,10 @@ UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
    AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.order'
    AND dr.is_active = true;
 
--- 4d. Reassign all 16 rules to the new upc.apl proceeding_type row.
+-- 4d. Reassign all 16 rules to the new upc.apl.unified proceeding_type row.
 UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
    SET proceeding_type_id = (
-        SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'upc.apl'
+        SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified'
        )
   FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
  WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
@@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ BEGIN
     SELECT COUNT(*) INTO unified_count
       FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
       JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
-     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl' AND dr.is_active = true;
-    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] post: rules on unified upc.apl = % (expected 16)', unified_count;
+     WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified' AND dr.is_active = true;
+    RAISE NOTICE '[mig 134] post: rules on unified upc.apl.unified = % (expected 16)', unified_count;
     IF unified_count <> 16 THEN
-        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 134] FAILED — expected 16 rules on upc.apl, got %', unified_count;
+        RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 134] FAILED — expected 16 rules on upc.apl.unified, got %', unified_count;
     END IF;
 
     SELECT COUNT(*) INTO archived_count
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ BEGIN
         SELECT unnest(applies_to_target) AS target, COUNT(*) AS n
           FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
           JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
-         WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl' AND dr.is_active = true
+         WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified' AND dr.is_active = true
          GROUP BY unnest(applies_to_target)
          ORDER BY 1
     LOOP

internal/services/lookup_events_test.go

@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ func TestLookupEvents(t *testing.T) {
 				t.Errorf("anchor row %s missing endentscheidung target: %v",
 					m.Rule.Name, m.Rule.AppliesToTarget)
 			}
-			if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl" {
-				t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl",
+			if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl.unified" {
+				t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl.unified",
 					m.Rule.Name, m.ProceedingType.Code)
 			}
 		}