Merge: t-paliad-131 Phase B3 — DE expansion (PatG §111 fix + BPatG Hinweisbeschluss + ZPO Anzeige)

This commit is contained in:
m
2026-05-05 01:57:43 +02:00
2 changed files with 220 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
-- Reverses 042_de_expansion_b3.
DELETE FROM paliad.deadline_rules
WHERE proceeding_type_id IN (
SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code IN ('DE_INF','DE_NULL')
)
AND code IN (
'de_inf.anzeige',
'de_null.replik_klaeger', 'de_null.hinweisbeschluss',
'de_null.stellungnahme', 'de_null.duplik'
);
DELETE FROM paliad.deadline_concepts
WHERE slug IN ('preliminary-opinion','response-to-preliminary-opinion','notice-of-defence-intention')
AND id NOT IN (SELECT concept_id FROM paliad.deadline_rules WHERE concept_id IS NOT NULL);
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET duration_value = 1,
deadline_notes = NULL,
deadline_notes_en = NULL
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_NULL')
AND code = 'de_null.beruf_begr';
WITH proc AS (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_INF')
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
SET sequence_order = CASE dr.code
WHEN 'de_inf.klage' THEN 0
WHEN 'de_inf.erwidg' THEN 1
WHEN 'de_inf.replik' THEN 2
WHEN 'de_inf.duplik' THEN 3
WHEN 'de_inf.termin' THEN 4
WHEN 'de_inf.urteil' THEN 5
WHEN 'de_inf.berufung' THEN 6
WHEN 'de_inf.beruf_begr' THEN 7
ELSE dr.sequence_order
END
FROM proc p
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = p.id;
WITH proc AS (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_NULL')
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
SET sequence_order = CASE dr.code
WHEN 'de_null.klage' THEN 0
WHEN 'de_null.erwidg' THEN 1
WHEN 'de_null.termin' THEN 2
WHEN 'de_null.urteil' THEN 3
WHEN 'de_null.berufung' THEN 4
WHEN 'de_null.beruf_begr' THEN 5
ELSE dr.sequence_order
END
FROM proc p
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = p.id;

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
-- t-paliad-131 Phase B3: DE proceeding-tree expansion + bug fix.
--
-- Three concerns:
--
-- 1. PatG §111(1) bug fix. Current paliad seed has de_null.beruf_begr at
-- 1 month. The current text of §111(1) PatG (BGBl. 2022) reads:
-- "Die Frist zur Begründung der Berufung beträgt drei Monate.
-- Sie beginnt mit der Zustellung des in vollständiger Form
-- abgefassten Urteils, spätestens mit Ablauf von fünf Monaten
-- nach der Verkündung." Bump to 3 months.
--
-- 2. DE_NULL Hinweisbeschluss cycle. PatG §83 mandates a qualified
-- opinion ("Hinweisbeschluss") issued by the BPatG before the
-- main hearing. Parties typically respond within ~3 months
-- (court-set per §83(2)). Plus the missing Replik/Duplik exchange
-- that is implicit in BPatG practice. All four are court-set so
-- they render as IsCourtSet placeholders; the user can fill in
-- real dates via the Phase A click-to-edit affordance.
--
-- 3. DE_INF Anzeige der Verteidigungsbereitschaft (ZPO §276(1) Satz 1).
-- Not yet on the timeline. 2 weeks from service of the Klage.
--
-- Out of scope (deferred to B6): cross-cutting Versäumnisurteil-
-- Einspruch (ZPO §339, trigger fires irregularly only when defendant
-- defaults), Schriftsatznachreichung (ZPO §296a, court-set after
-- Haupttermin), Wiedereinsetzung (PatG §123 / ZPO §233 / EPÜ Art.122).
-- ============================================================================
-- 1. PatG §111(1) duration fix
-- ============================================================================
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET duration_value = 3,
deadline_notes = 'Frist zur Berufungsbegründung beträgt 3 Monate (§ 111(1) Satz 1 PatG); spätestens 5 Monate nach Verkündung des Urteils.',
deadline_notes_en = 'Period for filing the Statement of Grounds is 3 months (PatG §111(1) sentence 1); at the latest 5 months after pronouncement of the judgment.'
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_NULL')
AND code = 'de_null.beruf_begr';
-- ============================================================================
-- 2. New concepts for the Hinweisbeschluss cycle + Anzeige
-- ============================================================================
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_concepts (slug, name_de, name_en, description, aliases, party, category, sort_order) VALUES
('preliminary-opinion', 'Hinweisbeschluss', 'Preliminary Opinion / Qualified Hint', 'Vom Gericht erteilter qualifizierter Hinweis nach § 83 PatG, der die vorläufige Auffassung zur Patentfähigkeit darlegt — typischerweise einige Monate vor der mündlichen Verhandlung.', ARRAY['Hinweisbeschluss', 'qualifizierter Hinweis', 'Preliminary Opinion', 'qualified hint', 'Section 83 PatG hint'], 'court', 'order', 65),
('response-to-preliminary-opinion', 'Stellungnahme zum Hinweisbeschluss', 'Response to Preliminary Opinion', 'Stellungnahme der Parteien zum qualifizierten Hinweis des BPatG (§ 83(2) PatG) — gerichtlich gesetzte Frist, typischerweise ~3 Monate.', ARRAY['Stellungnahme Hinweis', 'response to hint', 'Stellungnahme zum Hinweisbeschluss'], 'both', 'submission', 39),
('notice-of-defence-intention', 'Anzeige der Verteidigungsbereitschaft', 'Notice of Intent to Defend', 'Anzeige des Beklagten, dass er sich gegen die Klage verteidigen will (§ 276(1) Satz 1 ZPO) — 2 Wochen ab Zustellung der Klage.', ARRAY['Anzeige Verteidigungsbereitschaft', 'Verteidigungsanzeige', 'Notice of defence intent'], 'defendant', 'submission', 19)
ON CONFLICT (slug) DO UPDATE SET
name_de = EXCLUDED.name_de,
name_en = EXCLUDED.name_en,
description = EXCLUDED.description,
aliases = EXCLUDED.aliases,
party = EXCLUDED.party,
sort_order = EXCLUDED.sort_order,
updated_at = now();
-- ============================================================================
-- 3. Renumber DE_INF + DE_NULL to leave gaps for new rows
-- ============================================================================
WITH proc AS (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_INF')
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
SET sequence_order = CASE dr.code
WHEN 'de_inf.klage' THEN 0
WHEN 'de_inf.erwidg' THEN 20
WHEN 'de_inf.replik' THEN 30
WHEN 'de_inf.duplik' THEN 40
WHEN 'de_inf.termin' THEN 50
WHEN 'de_inf.urteil' THEN 60
WHEN 'de_inf.berufung' THEN 70
WHEN 'de_inf.beruf_begr' THEN 80
ELSE dr.sequence_order
END
FROM proc p
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = p.id;
WITH proc AS (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'DE_NULL')
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
SET sequence_order = CASE dr.code
WHEN 'de_null.klage' THEN 0
WHEN 'de_null.erwidg' THEN 10
WHEN 'de_null.termin' THEN 50
WHEN 'de_null.urteil' THEN 60
WHEN 'de_null.berufung' THEN 70
WHEN 'de_null.beruf_begr' THEN 80
ELSE dr.sequence_order
END
FROM proc p
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = p.id;
-- ============================================================================
-- 4. DE_INF — add Anzeige der Verteidigungsbereitschaft
-- ============================================================================
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_rules (
proceeding_type_id, parent_id, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type,
is_mandatory, duration_value, duration_unit, timing, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en,
sequence_order, condition_flag, concept_id, legal_source, is_spawn, is_active
)
SELECT
pt.id, parent_rule.id,
'de_inf.anzeige', 'Anzeige der Verteidigungsbereitschaft', 'Notice of Intent to Defend',
'defendant', 'filing', true, 2, 'weeks', 'after', '§ 276 ZPO',
'Innerhalb von 2 Wochen nach Zustellung der Klage hat der Beklagte gegenüber dem Gericht anzuzeigen, ob er sich verteidigen will (§ 276(1) Satz 1 ZPO). Versäumnis kann zu Versäumnisurteil führen.',
'Within 2 weeks of service of the Klage the defendant must notify the court whether they intend to defend (ZPO §276(1) sentence 1). Failure can result in a default judgment.',
10, NULL,
(SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = 'notice-of-defence-intention'),
'DE.ZPO.276.1', false, true
FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
JOIN paliad.deadline_rules parent_rule ON parent_rule.proceeding_type_id = pt.id AND parent_rule.code = 'de_inf.klage'
WHERE pt.code = 'DE_INF';
-- ============================================================================
-- 5. DE_NULL — add Replik / Hinweisbeschluss / Stellungnahme / Duplik
-- ============================================================================
-- Wave 1: replik_klaeger + hinweisbeschluss (parents = pre-existing erwidg)
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_rules (
proceeding_type_id, parent_id, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type,
is_mandatory, duration_value, duration_unit, timing, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en,
sequence_order, condition_flag, concept_id, legal_source, is_spawn, is_active
)
SELECT
pt.id, parent_rule.id, new.code, new.name, new.name_en, new.primary_party, new.event_type,
true, new.duration_value, new.duration_unit, 'after', new.rule_code, new.deadline_notes, new.deadline_notes_en,
new.sequence_order, NULL,
(SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = new.concept_slug),
new.legal_source, false, true
FROM (VALUES
('de_null.erwidg', 'de_null.replik_klaeger', 'Replik', 'Reply',
'claimant', 'filing', 2, 'months', '§ 83 PatG',
'Vom Gericht gesetzte Frist (§ 83(2) PatG); typischerweise ~2 Monate. Nach Eintritt des Datums per Klick anpassbar.',
'Court-set deadline (PatG §83(2)); typically ~2 months. Click the date to set the actual court-ordered period.',
20, 'reply-to-defence', 'DE.PatG.83.2'),
('de_null.erwidg', 'de_null.hinweisbeschluss', 'Hinweisbeschluss', 'Preliminary Opinion (Qualified Hint)',
'court', 'order', 0, 'months', '§ 83 PatG',
'Qualifizierter Hinweis des BPatG (§ 83(1) PatG), in dem die vorläufige Auffassung zur Patentfähigkeit dargelegt wird. Wird typischerweise einige Monate vor der mündlichen Verhandlung erlassen.',
'BPatG qualified opinion (PatG §83(1)) setting out the preliminary view on patentability. Typically issued some months before the main hearing.',
30, 'preliminary-opinion', 'DE.PatG.83.1')
) AS new(parent_code, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type, duration_value, duration_unit, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en, sequence_order, concept_slug, legal_source)
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.code = 'DE_NULL'
JOIN paliad.deadline_rules parent_rule ON parent_rule.proceeding_type_id = pt.id AND parent_rule.code = new.parent_code;
-- Wave 2: stellungnahme (parent=hinweisbeschluss) + duplik (parent=replik_klaeger)
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_rules (
proceeding_type_id, parent_id, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type,
is_mandatory, duration_value, duration_unit, timing, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en,
sequence_order, condition_flag, concept_id, legal_source, is_spawn, is_active
)
SELECT
pt.id, parent_rule.id, new.code, new.name, new.name_en, new.primary_party, new.event_type,
true, new.duration_value, new.duration_unit, 'after', new.rule_code, new.deadline_notes, new.deadline_notes_en,
new.sequence_order, NULL,
(SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = new.concept_slug),
new.legal_source, false, true
FROM (VALUES
('de_null.hinweisbeschluss', 'de_null.stellungnahme', 'Stellungnahme zum Hinweisbeschluss', 'Response to Preliminary Opinion',
'both', 'filing', 0, 'months', '§ 83 PatG',
'Stellungnahme der Parteien zum qualifizierten Hinweis (§ 83(2) PatG) — vom Gericht gesetzte Frist, typischerweise ~3 Monate.',
'Parties'' response to the qualified hint (PatG §83(2)) — court-set deadline, typically ~3 months.',
35, 'response-to-preliminary-opinion', 'DE.PatG.83.2'),
('de_null.replik_klaeger', 'de_null.duplik', 'Duplik', 'Rejoinder',
'defendant', 'filing', 1, 'months', '§ 83 PatG',
'Vom Gericht gesetzte Frist (§ 83(2) PatG); typischerweise ~1 Monat. Nach Eintritt des Datums per Klick anpassbar.',
'Court-set deadline (PatG §83(2)); typically ~1 month. Click the date to set the actual court-ordered period.',
40, 'rejoinder', 'DE.PatG.83.2')
) AS new(parent_code, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type, duration_value, duration_unit, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en, sequence_order, concept_slug, legal_source)
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.code = 'DE_NULL'
JOIN paliad.deadline_rules parent_rule ON parent_rule.proceeding_type_id = pt.id AND parent_rule.code = new.parent_code;