feat(deadlines): mig 137 backfill applies_to_target — Schadensbemessung (merits) + Bucheinsicht (order)
After Slice B1's Berufung unification (mig 134), the picker exposed five appeal targets but only three carried rules. Schadensbemessung and Bucheinsicht returned empty timelines. m's 2026-05-26 decision (#134): R.224 is uniform across substantive R.118 decisions, and R.220.2 / R.224.2.b / R.235.2 / R.237 / R.238.2 are uniform across the orders they appeal — so the existing merits-track and order-track rules can carry the missing targets via a non-destructive applies_to_target extension. Audit of live `paliad.deadline_rules` for upc.apl.unified (proceeding_type_id=160): - 7 endentscheidung rules → extend with 'schadensbemessung' - 7 anordnung rules → extend with 'bucheinsicht' - 2 kostenentscheidung rules — untouched (distinct leave-to-appeal track) Migration: - set_config('paliad.audit_reason', …) at top of UP and DOWN — required by the mig 079 deadline_rule_audit_trigger on every UPDATE. - Audit-first DO block lists every row to be touched (pre/post state) and RAISE EXCEPTIONs on pre-condition drift (missing proceeding_type, wrong rule counts, partial-run carry-over of the new targets). - Two narrow UPDATEs keyed off upc.apl.unified + existing target + absence of new target. - Post-sanity asserts schad=7, buch=7, end=7, anord=7, cost=2 — hard RAISE EXCEPTION on any drift. - DOWN strips both new targets via array_remove with the same WHERE. - No deadline_rules.updated_at writes; column exists but the migration is single-purpose and leaves it as-is. Dry-run via Supabase MCP confirmed: - UP yields {schad:7, buch:7, end:7, anord:7, cost:2} on prod. - DOWN restores {schad:0, buch:0, end:7, anord:7, cost:2}. - DB returned to pre-state; the real golang-migrate boot path will apply 137 cleanly at next deploy. Test: - lookup_events_test.go: the schadensbemessung empty-result assertion becomes the inverse (rules expected). Adds a parallel bucheinsicht assertion. Same anchor-row shape check as the existing endentscheidung case (DepthFromAnchor=1, target ∈ AppliesToTarget, proceeding_type = upc.apl.unified). - `go test ./...` green. Refs: m/paliad#134, t-paliad-303. Lessons applied from mig 134 hotfixes: audit_reason set_config, no updated_at writes, audit live DB before drafting, RAISE EXCEPTION on integrity violations.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
||||
-- 137_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order DOWN — t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Removes 'schadensbemessung' from the merits-track rules and
|
||||
-- 'bucheinsicht' from the order-track rules, restoring the pre-137
|
||||
-- shape (endentscheidung-only / anordnung-only / kostenentscheidung-only).
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 0. Audit reason (required by mig 079 trigger for any UPDATE on
|
||||
-- paliad.deadline_rules).
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT set_config(
|
||||
'paliad.audit_reason',
|
||||
'mig 137 DOWN: t-paliad-303 — strip Schadensbemessung/Bucheinsicht from applies_to_target per m/paliad#134',
|
||||
true);
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 1. Strip new targets via array_remove.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- WHERE clauses pinned to upc.apl.unified to avoid touching unrelated
|
||||
-- rules that might have been added later under other proceeding types.
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
-- 1a. Remove schadensbemessung from merits-track rows.
|
||||
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
SET applies_to_target = array_remove(dr.applies_to_target, 'schadensbemessung')
|
||||
FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
|
||||
WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
|
||||
-- 1b. Remove bucheinsicht from order-track rows.
|
||||
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
SET applies_to_target = array_remove(dr.applies_to_target, 'bucheinsicht')
|
||||
FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
|
||||
WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 2. Sanity check — no row may carry the new targets after the down.
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
DO $$
|
||||
DECLARE
|
||||
schad_left int;
|
||||
buch_left int;
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_left
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_left
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
|
||||
IF schad_left > 0 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137 DOWN] FAILED — % rows still carry schadensbemessung', schad_left;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF buch_left > 0 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137 DOWN] FAILED — % rows still carry bucheinsicht', buch_left;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137 DOWN] stripped schadensbemessung + bucheinsicht from upc.apl.unified rules';
|
||||
END $$;
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
|
||||
-- 137_appeal_target_backfill_merits_order — t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Slice B1 (mig 134) introduced the unified upc.apl.unified proceeding type
|
||||
-- with 5 appeal_target enum values: endentscheidung, kostenentscheidung,
|
||||
-- anordnung, schadensbemessung, bucheinsicht. The first three each carry
|
||||
-- rules; schadensbemessung and bucheinsicht returned an empty timeline
|
||||
-- because no rules referenced them yet.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- m's 2026-05-26 decision (#134): extend applies_to_target on the existing
|
||||
-- rules — Schadensbemessung := merits track (R.224 anchored on R.118
|
||||
-- substantive decisions), Bucheinsicht := order track (R.220.2 +
|
||||
-- R.224.2.b + R.235.2 + R.237 + R.238.2 etc.). Legal premise verified
|
||||
-- against the 16 live rules — every endentscheidung rule is a generic
|
||||
-- R.224 merits step, every anordnung rule is a generic R.220/224/235/237/
|
||||
-- 238 order step. No rule carries content specific to a particular kind
|
||||
-- of underlying decision/order. Audit on the comment trail of #134.
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 0. Audit reason (required by mig 079 trigger for any UPDATE on
|
||||
-- paliad.deadline_rules — both UPDATEs below trigger it).
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT set_config(
|
||||
'paliad.audit_reason',
|
||||
'mig 137: t-paliad-303 — extend applies_to_target for Schadensbemessung (merits) + Bucheinsicht (order) per m/paliad#134',
|
||||
true);
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 1. Audit-first DO block.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Resolve upc.apl.unified, count the rows we are about to touch, and
|
||||
-- RAISE EXCEPTION if anything looks wrong (proceeding type missing,
|
||||
-- merits/order rule counts off, or a rule already carries the new
|
||||
-- target — which would mean an earlier partial run).
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
DO $$
|
||||
DECLARE
|
||||
rec record;
|
||||
upc_apl_id int;
|
||||
merits_count int;
|
||||
order_count int;
|
||||
schad_already int;
|
||||
buch_already int;
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
SELECT id INTO upc_apl_id
|
||||
FROM paliad.proceeding_types
|
||||
WHERE code = 'upc.apl.unified';
|
||||
IF upc_apl_id IS NULL THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] upc.apl.unified proceeding_type not found — mig 134 must run first';
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] upc.apl.unified proceeding_type_id = %', upc_apl_id;
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO merits_count
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules
|
||||
WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO order_count
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules
|
||||
WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'anordnung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
|
||||
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] live counts: endentscheidung=% anordnung=%', merits_count, order_count;
|
||||
IF merits_count <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] expected 7 endentscheidung rules under upc.apl.unified, got %', merits_count;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF order_count <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] expected 7 anordnung rules under upc.apl.unified, got %', order_count;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_already
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules
|
||||
WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_already
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules
|
||||
WHERE proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(applies_to_target);
|
||||
IF schad_already > 0 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] % rules already carry schadensbemessung — partial run?', schad_already;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF buch_already > 0 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] % rules already carry bucheinsicht — partial run?', buch_already;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] rules to extend with schadensbemessung (merits track):';
|
||||
FOR rec IN
|
||||
SELECT dr.id, dr.rule_code, dr.legal_source, dr.name, dr.applies_to_target
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
|
||||
ORDER BY dr.sequence_order, dr.rule_code NULLS LAST
|
||||
LOOP
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] merits % % % pre=% → post=%',
|
||||
COALESCE(rec.rule_code, '(no-code)'),
|
||||
COALESCE(rec.legal_source, '(no-source)'),
|
||||
rec.name,
|
||||
rec.applies_to_target,
|
||||
rec.applies_to_target || 'schadensbemessung'::text;
|
||||
END LOOP;
|
||||
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] rules to extend with bucheinsicht (order track):';
|
||||
FOR rec IN
|
||||
SELECT dr.id, dr.rule_code, dr.legal_source, dr.name, dr.applies_to_target
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
WHERE dr.proceeding_type_id = upc_apl_id
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
|
||||
ORDER BY dr.sequence_order, dr.rule_code NULLS LAST
|
||||
LOOP
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] order % % % pre=% → post=%',
|
||||
COALESCE(rec.rule_code, '(no-code)'),
|
||||
COALESCE(rec.legal_source, '(no-source)'),
|
||||
rec.name,
|
||||
rec.applies_to_target,
|
||||
rec.applies_to_target || 'bucheinsicht'::text;
|
||||
END LOOP;
|
||||
END $$;
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 2. Extend applies_to_target.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Narrow WHERE clauses key off upc.apl.unified + existing target +
|
||||
-- absence of new target, so the UPDATEs are idempotent in spirit
|
||||
-- (the audit block above already RAISE EXCEPTIONed if any row
|
||||
-- already had the new value).
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
-- 2a. Schadensbemessung := merits track (7 rules expected).
|
||||
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
SET applies_to_target = applies_to_target || 'schadensbemessung'::text
|
||||
FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
|
||||
WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
|
||||
AND NOT ('schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target));
|
||||
|
||||
-- 2b. Bucheinsicht := order track (7 rules expected).
|
||||
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
SET applies_to_target = applies_to_target || 'bucheinsicht'::text
|
||||
FROM paliad.proceeding_types pt
|
||||
WHERE pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
AND pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target)
|
||||
AND NOT ('bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target));
|
||||
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
-- 3. Post-migration sanity check.
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Hard-fail on any divergence: the two new targets must each cover
|
||||
-- 7 rules, the original three targets must be unchanged in count,
|
||||
-- and no rule has lost its prior target.
|
||||
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
DO $$
|
||||
DECLARE
|
||||
schad_post int;
|
||||
buch_post int;
|
||||
end_post int;
|
||||
anord_post int;
|
||||
cost_post int;
|
||||
target_distribution record;
|
||||
BEGIN
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO schad_post
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'schadensbemessung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO buch_post
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'bucheinsicht' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO end_post
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'endentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO anord_post
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'anordnung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO cost_post
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified'
|
||||
AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
AND 'kostenentscheidung' = ANY(dr.applies_to_target);
|
||||
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] post: schadensbemessung=% bucheinsicht=% endentscheidung=% anordnung=% kostenentscheidung=%',
|
||||
schad_post, buch_post, end_post, anord_post, cost_post;
|
||||
|
||||
IF schad_post <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] FAILED — expected 7 schadensbemessung rules, got %', schad_post;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF buch_post <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] FAILED — expected 7 bucheinsicht rules, got %', buch_post;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF end_post <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] FAILED — endentscheidung count drifted: expected 7, got %', end_post;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF anord_post <> 7 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] FAILED — anordnung count drifted: expected 7, got %', anord_post;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
IF cost_post <> 2 THEN
|
||||
RAISE EXCEPTION '[mig 137] FAILED — kostenentscheidung count drifted: expected 2, got %', cost_post;
|
||||
END IF;
|
||||
|
||||
FOR target_distribution IN
|
||||
SELECT unnest(applies_to_target) AS target, COUNT(*) AS n
|
||||
FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
|
||||
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
|
||||
WHERE pt.code = 'upc.apl.unified' AND dr.is_active = true
|
||||
GROUP BY unnest(applies_to_target)
|
||||
ORDER BY 1
|
||||
LOOP
|
||||
RAISE NOTICE '[mig 137] post: applies_to_target=% count=%',
|
||||
target_distribution.target, target_distribution.n;
|
||||
END LOOP;
|
||||
END $$;
|
||||
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ func TestLookupEvents(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("appeal_target=schadensbemessung returns empty (no rules seeded yet)", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Run("appeal_target=schadensbemessung returns upc.apl merits rules (mig 137 backfill)", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
matches, err := catalog.LookupEvents(ctx, lp.EventLookupAxes{
|
||||
Jurisdiction: "UPC",
|
||||
AppealTarget: lp.AppealTargetSchadensbemessung,
|
||||
@@ -152,8 +152,68 @@ func TestLookupEvents(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("LookupEvents: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(matches) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("schadensbemessung should be empty until rules seeded; got %d rows", len(matches))
|
||||
// mig 137 (t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134) extends the 7 merits-track
|
||||
// rules under upc.apl.unified with applies_to_target ⊇ {schadensbemessung}
|
||||
// because R.224 is uniform across substantive R.118 decisions.
|
||||
if len(matches) == 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected upc.apl schadensbemessung rules after mig 137 backfill")
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, m := range matches {
|
||||
if m.DepthFromAnchor != 1 {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
found := false
|
||||
for _, t := range m.Rule.AppliesToTarget {
|
||||
if t == lp.AppealTargetSchadensbemessung {
|
||||
found = true
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !found {
|
||||
t.Errorf("anchor row %s missing schadensbemessung target: %v",
|
||||
m.Rule.Name, m.Rule.AppliesToTarget)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl.unified" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl.unified",
|
||||
m.Rule.Name, m.ProceedingType.Code)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("appeal_target=bucheinsicht returns upc.apl order rules (mig 137 backfill)", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
matches, err := catalog.LookupEvents(ctx, lp.EventLookupAxes{
|
||||
Jurisdiction: "UPC",
|
||||
AppealTarget: lp.AppealTargetBucheinsicht,
|
||||
}, lp.EventLookupDepthAllFollowing)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("LookupEvents: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// mig 137 (t-paliad-303, m/paliad#134) extends the 7 order-track
|
||||
// rules under upc.apl.unified with applies_to_target ⊇ {bucheinsicht}
|
||||
// because R.220.2 / R.224.2.b / R.235.2 / R.237 / R.238.2 are
|
||||
// uniform across the orders they appeal.
|
||||
if len(matches) == 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected upc.apl bucheinsicht rules after mig 137 backfill")
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, m := range matches {
|
||||
if m.DepthFromAnchor != 1 {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
found := false
|
||||
for _, t := range m.Rule.AppliesToTarget {
|
||||
if t == lp.AppealTargetBucheinsicht {
|
||||
found = true
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !found {
|
||||
t.Errorf("anchor row %s missing bucheinsicht target: %v",
|
||||
m.Rule.Name, m.Rule.AppliesToTarget)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if m.ProceedingType.Code != "upc.apl.unified" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("anchor row %s came from %s, want upc.apl.unified",
|
||||
m.Rule.Name, m.ProceedingType.Code)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user