m's 2026-05-08 17:50 feedback: 'Antrag auf Kostenentscheidung' (RoP.151)
labels itself "wird vom Gericht bestimmt" but the rule is actually
"1 Monat ab Hauptentscheidung". The court doesn't directly determine
this date — it determines the parent's date (Hauptentscheidung) and
this rule chains off that. Calling it "vom Gericht bestimmt" overstates
the relationship; "unbestimmt" reads correctly: derived from a
not-yet-known anchor.
Two failure modes split:
- Direct court-set rule itself is hearing / decision / order
(or primary_party='court'). Label stays
"wird vom Gericht bestimmt" — strictly correct.
- Indirect court-set rule has a real duration but its anchor is a
court-set parent (RoP.151 case), or it's a
zero-duration rule whose parent is court-set
without a real date. Label flips to
"unbestimmt".
Backend: new `IsCourtSetIndirect bool` on UIDeadline, set on the three
indirect cases inside FristenrechnerService.Calculate. Direct cases
keep IsCourtSetIndirect=false so their label stays unchanged. JSON
omits the field when false, no consumer churn.
Frontend: deadlineCardHtml + the save-modal row both consult
IsCourtSetIndirect to pick between two i18n keys (deadlines.court.set
"vom Gericht bestimmt" and deadlines.court.indirect "unbestimmt"; EN
falls back to "set by court" / "tbd"). The override edit affordance
keeps working unchanged — user types the actual parent date, downstream
re-flows.
Refs m/paliad#15 (m's 2026-05-08 17:50 feedback Item 1).
ef78f59d25