Phase 2 P1 / m's Q5 divergence (2026-05-27, verbatim):
"Reverse the unification as suggested in 3. They are different
proceedings, I only wanted the approach to be unified in the
'determinator' — but they are actually different proceedings!"
Mig 155 reverts the mig-096 unification:
Before: id=160 upc.apl.unified active (16 rules), id=11/19/20 inactive
After: id=11 upc.apl.merits (7 rules), id=19 upc.apl.cost (2 rules),
id=20 upc.apl.order (7 rules) all active; id=160 inactive
The 16 rules under id=160 split cleanly by event_code prefix; all 10
parent_id edges among them are bucket-local (pre-flight audit), so
the tree shape survives the rebind unchanged.
Spawn FK retarget: pi.cfi.appeal_spawn flips from 11 (merits) → 20
(orders track) per design §3.1 — PI appeals land on orders, not
merits. The inf/rev/dmgs spawns keep target=11 (merits), now active.
Determinator routing layer (proceeding_mapping.go) keeps its single
"Berufung" front door per m's intent — only the data shape changes.
Pre-flight verified: 0 projects bound to id=160, 0 scenarios reference
upc.apl. Zero data migration on the project side.
Tests: lookup_events_test.go assertions on the three appeal_target
buckets updated to the new codes (endentscheidung → upc.apl.merits,
schadensbemessung → upc.apl.merits, bucheinsicht → upc.apl.order).
Same rule set, post-split coordinates.
Snapshot regen (pkg/litigationplanner/embedded/upc/) deferred: the
current snapshot only contains inf+rev so the apl re-split doesn't
shift its contents; regenerating would surface unrelated active PTs
and pollute this slice. Tracked as a follow-up.
Verified: go vet clean, go test ./internal/services/... -run
LookupEvents|proceeding_codes clean.
Design: docs/design-deadline-system-revision-2026-05-27.md §3.1
(re-split mig), §1.3 (spawn graph post-Q5). t-paliad-331.
mAi
3a4e99cb92