Files
paliad/internal/db/migrations/045_epa_gap_fill.up.sql
m 706afb617f feat(t-paliad-131): Phase B5 — EPA gap-fill (R.79.2/3, R.116, R.106) + EPA_OPP/APP anchor fix
PR-6 of the Unified Fristenrechner. Fills the EPA-side coverage gaps
named in the design + repairs three pre-existing EPA bugs surfaced
during this work.

Migration 045:

PRE-EXISTING BUG FIXES

1. EPA anchor convention bug. epa_opp.grant and epa_app.entsch were
   seeded with party='court' + event_type='decision' → calculator's
   isCourtDeterminedRule(r) returned true → those anchor rows
   rendered as IsCourtSet (no date), propagating IsCourtSet to every
   downstream rule that chained off them. Result on prod: EPA_OPP
   showed "court-set" for Einspruchsfrist / Erwiderung / Entscheidung
   instead of computed dates; ONLY the trailing beschwerde + begr
   rendered dates (and only by accident, because they had parent_id=
   NULL and computed off triggerDate directly).

   Fix: changed both anchors to party='both' + event_type='filing' so
   they render as IsRootEvent. Matches the convention I established
   for DE_INF_OLG / DE_INF_BGH / DE_NULL_BGH / DPMA_BPATG_BESCHWERDE /
   DPMA_BGH_RB anchors in PR-3/4/5.

2. EPA_OPP appeal-phase parent bug. epa_opp.beschwerde +
   beschwerde_begr had parent_id=NULL → were computing 2mo and 4mo
   from the GRANT date instead of from the OPPOSITION DECISION date.
   Re-parented both on epa_opp.entsch. They now correctly render as
   IsCourtSet placeholders (because entsch is court-set) until the
   user enters the real decision date via the Phase A click-to-edit
   affordance.

3. EPA_APP.erwidg modelling bug. Was parent_id=NULL + duration=0 +
   party=both + event=filing → IsRootEvent → emitted the trigger date
   as "Erwiderung". Now properly modelled per Art. 12(1)(c) RPBA 2020:
   parent=epa_app.begr, duration=4 months, name="Beschwerdeerwiderung",
   legal_source=EU.RPBA.12.1.c, response-to-appeal concept.

NEW COVERAGE (per design §5.3)

EPA_OPP gains 2 rules:
  - epa_opp.r79_further: Stellungnahme weiterer Beteiligter
    (R.79(2)/(3) EPC) — court-set, parent=erwidg
  - epa_opp.r116: Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung
    (R.116(1) EPC) — court-set, parent=entsch (so it surfaces in the
    opposition phase but stays IsCourtSet until oral hearing date is
    entered via override)

EPA_APP gains 2 rules:
  - epa_app.r116: Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung
    (R.116(1) EPC + Art. 13 RPBA) — court-set, parent=oral
  - epa_app.r106: Antrag auf Überprüfung
    (Art. 112a EPÜ) — 2 months from service of decision, parent=
    entsch2 (the BoA decision)

Three new EN-slug concepts (UPC/EPC-native): r79-further-stellungnahme,
r116-final-submissions, petition-for-review.

Live-verified on paliad.de:
  EPA_OPP trigger 2026-05-04 → grant IsRootEvent / Einspruchsfrist
    2027-02-04 (9mo) / Erwiderung 2027-06-04 (4mo from frist) /
    r79_further 2027-06-04 (filed-with-erwidg) / Entscheidung +
    Beschwerde + Begründung + r116 IsCourtSet (waiting for entsch).
  EPA_APP trigger 2026-05-04 → entsch IsRootEvent / Beschwerde
    2026-07-06 (2mo, weekend-shift) / Begründung 2026-09-04 (4mo from
    entsch) / Beschwerdeerwiderung 2027-01-04 (4mo from Begründung
    per RPBA 12.1.c) / r116 IsCourtSet (parent=oral) / r106 IsCourtSet
    (parent=entsch2, will compute 2mo from BoA decision once entered).

Out of scope (deferred to PR-7 cross-cutting): Wiedereinsetzung
(Art. 122 EPÜ + R.136 EPC), Weiterbehandlung (Art. 121 EPÜ + R.135 EPC),
Validierungsfrist national (Art. 65 EPÜ).
2026-05-05 03:17:46 +02:00

193 lines
12 KiB
SQL

-- t-paliad-131 Phase B5: EPA gap-fill.
--
-- Three concerns:
--
-- 1. Existing EPA anchor bug. Both epa_opp.grant and epa_app.entsch
-- are anchor rows ("the trigger date is the grant publication" /
-- "the trigger is the service of the appealable decision") but were
-- seeded with party='court' + event_type='decision'. The
-- calculator's isCourtDeterminedRule(r) returns true for that
-- combo → those rows render as IsCourtSet (no date), which then
-- propagates IsCourtSet to every downstream rule that chains off
-- them. As a result, EPA_OPP today shows "court-set" for
-- Einspruchsfrist / Erwiderung etc. instead of computed dates.
-- Fix: change anchor rows to party='both' + event_type='filing' so
-- they render as IsRootEvent — matches the convention used for
-- DE_INF_OLG / DE_INF_BGH / DE_NULL_BGH / DPMA_BPATG_BESCHWERDE /
-- DPMA_BGH_RB anchors landed in PR-3/4/5.
--
-- 2. Existing EPA_OPP appeal-phase parent bug. epa_opp.beschwerde +
-- beschwerde_begr currently have parent_id=NULL → they compute from
-- triggerDate (= grant publication), which is wrong: the appeal
-- period runs from service of the OPPOSITION decision, not from
-- grant. Re-parent them on epa_opp.entsch.
--
-- 3. Coverage gap-fill per design §5.3:
-- - R.79(2)/(3) EPC: Stellungnahmen weiterer Beteiligter im
-- Einspruch — court-set
-- - R.116(1) EPC: 1-Monats-Frist vor mündlicher Verhandlung für
-- letzte Schriftsätze — court-set (EPA sets the absolute date when
-- summoning, this rule guarantees ≥1 month of preparation)
-- - Art.112a EPÜ + R.106 EPC: Antrag auf Überprüfung der
-- Beschwerdekammerentscheidung beim Großen Beschwerdekammer —
-- 2 Monate ab Zustellung der Entscheidung
--
-- Three new concepts (UPC/EPC-native → EN slugs):
-- r79-stellungnahme, r116-eingaben, petition-for-review
-- Plus reuse existing decision/oral-hearing/notice-of-appeal etc.
-- ============================================================================
-- 1. Fix anchor convention on existing EPA_OPP / EPA_APP / EP_GRANT
-- ============================================================================
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET primary_party = 'both',
event_type = 'filing',
deadline_notes = 'Veröffentlichung der Patenterteilung im EPA-Patentblatt — Trigger für die 9-Monats-Einspruchsfrist (Art. 99(1) EPÜ).',
deadline_notes_en = 'Publication of the patent grant in the EPO Bulletin — trigger for the 9-month opposition period (Art. 99(1) EPC).'
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'EPA_OPP')
AND code = 'epa_opp.grant';
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET primary_party = 'both',
event_type = 'filing',
name = 'Zustellung der Beschwerdeentscheidung',
name_en = 'Service of Decision under Appeal',
deadline_notes = 'Zustellung der angegriffenen Entscheidung der Einspruchs- oder Prüfungsabteilung — Trigger für die 2-Monats-Beschwerdefrist (Art. 108 EPÜ).',
deadline_notes_en = 'Service of the decision under appeal (from the Opposition or Examining Division) — trigger for the 2-month appeal period (Art. 108 EPC).'
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'EPA_APP')
AND code = 'epa_app.entsch';
-- ============================================================================
-- 2. Fix EPA_OPP appeal-phase parent: should chain off entsch, not trigger
-- ============================================================================
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET parent_id = (
SELECT dr.id FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
WHERE pt.code = 'EPA_OPP' AND dr.code = 'epa_opp.entsch'
)
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'EPA_OPP')
AND code IN ('epa_opp.beschwerde', 'epa_opp.beschwerde_begr');
-- ============================================================================
-- 3. Fix EPA_APP.erwidg modelling
-- ============================================================================
--
-- Today: parent_id=NULL, duration=0, party=both, event=filing →
-- IsRootEvent → emits trigger date as "Erwiderung". Wrong: the
-- Beschwerdeerwiderung is a real submission per Art. 12(1)(c) RPBA 2020,
-- typical 4 months from service of the Statement of Grounds.
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET name = 'Beschwerdeerwiderung',
name_en = 'Response to Statement of Grounds',
parent_id = (
SELECT dr.id FROM paliad.deadline_rules dr
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = dr.proceeding_type_id
WHERE pt.code = 'EPA_APP' AND dr.code = 'epa_app.begr'
),
duration_value = 4,
duration_unit = 'months',
primary_party = 'both',
event_type = 'filing',
rule_code = 'RPBA Art. 12',
legal_source = 'EU.RPBA.12.1.c',
deadline_notes = 'Erwiderung der anderen Verfahrensbeteiligten auf die Beschwerdebegründung — typischerweise 4 Monate ab Zustellung der Begründung (Art. 12(1)(c) RPBA 2020). Kammer kann andere Frist setzen.',
deadline_notes_en = 'Response by other parties to the Statement of Grounds of Appeal — typically 4 months from service of the grounds (Art. 12(1)(c) RPBA 2020). The Board may set a different period.'
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'EPA_APP')
AND code = 'epa_app.erwidg';
-- ============================================================================
-- 4. New concepts (UPC/EPC-native → EN slugs)
-- ============================================================================
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_concepts (slug, name_de, name_en, description, aliases, party, category, sort_order) VALUES
('r79-further-stellungnahme', 'Stellungnahme weiterer Beteiligter', 'Further-Party Submission (R.79)',
'Stellungnahmen anderer Verfahrensbeteiligter im EPA-Einspruchsverfahren (R. 79(2) und R. 79(3) EPÜ) — vom EPA gesetzte Frist.',
ARRAY['Stellungnahme weiterer Beteiligter', 'further party submission', 'R79 submission'],
'both', 'submission', 43),
('r116-final-submissions', 'Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung', 'Final Written Submissions before Oral Proceedings (R.116)',
'Letzte schriftliche Eingaben vor der mündlichen Verhandlung (R. 116(1) EPÜ) — vom EPA mindestens 1 Monat vor der mündl. Verhandlung gesetzt.',
ARRAY['R116 submissions', 'R 116', 'final submissions oral hearing', 'Eingaben mündliche Verhandlung'],
'both', 'submission', 44),
('petition-for-review', 'Antrag auf Überprüfung', 'Petition for Review (Art. 112a EPC)',
'Antrag auf Überprüfung der Entscheidung der Beschwerdekammer durch die Große Beschwerdekammer (Art. 112a EPÜ) — 2 Monate ab Zustellung der Entscheidung. Beschränkt auf Verfahrensmängel.',
ARRAY['Antrag auf Überprüfung', 'petition for review', 'Art. 112a EPÜ', 'Große Beschwerdekammer'],
'both', 'submission', 45)
ON CONFLICT (slug) DO UPDATE SET
name_de = EXCLUDED.name_de,
name_en = EXCLUDED.name_en,
description = EXCLUDED.description,
aliases = EXCLUDED.aliases,
party = EXCLUDED.party,
sort_order = EXCLUDED.sort_order,
updated_at = now();
-- Backfill concept_id on the existing fixed epa_app.erwidg
UPDATE paliad.deadline_rules
SET concept_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = 'response-to-appeal')
WHERE proceeding_type_id = (SELECT id FROM paliad.proceeding_types WHERE code = 'EPA_APP')
AND code = 'epa_app.erwidg';
-- ============================================================================
-- 5. New rules — EPA_OPP gets R.79(2/3) + R.116
-- ============================================================================
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_rules (
proceeding_type_id, parent_id, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type,
is_mandatory, duration_value, duration_unit, timing, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en,
sequence_order, condition_flag, concept_id, legal_source, is_spawn, is_active
)
SELECT
pt.id, parent_rule.id, new.code, new.name, new.name_en, new.primary_party, new.event_type,
false, new.duration_value, new.duration_unit, 'after', new.rule_code, new.deadline_notes, new.deadline_notes_en,
new.sequence_order, NULL,
(SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = new.concept_slug),
new.legal_source, false, true
FROM (VALUES
('epa_opp.erwidg', 'epa_opp.r79_further', 'Stellungnahme weiterer Beteiligter', 'Further-Party Submission',
'both', 'filing', 0, 'months', 'R. 79 EPÜ',
'Stellungnahmen anderer Verfahrensbeteiligter (R. 79(2), R. 79(3) EPÜ) — vom EPA gesetzte Frist nach der Erwiderung des Patentinhabers.',
'Submissions by other parties to opposition proceedings (R. 79(2)/(3) EPC) — EPO-set deadline following the proprietor''s response.',
25, 'r79-further-stellungnahme', 'EU.EPC-R.79.2'),
('epa_opp.entsch', 'epa_opp.r116', 'Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung', 'Final Written Submissions before Oral Proceedings',
'both', 'filing', 0, 'months', 'R. 116 EPÜ',
'Letzte schriftliche Eingaben mindestens 1 Monat vor der mündlichen Verhandlung (R. 116(1) EPÜ) — die EPA-Einspruchsabteilung setzt das genaue Datum mit der Ladung.',
'Final written submissions at least 1 month before the oral proceedings (R. 116(1) EPC) — the EPO Opposition Division sets the exact date when issuing the summons.',
28, 'r116-final-submissions', 'EU.EPC-R.116.1')
) AS new(parent_code, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type, duration_value, duration_unit, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en, sequence_order, concept_slug, legal_source)
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.code = 'EPA_OPP'
JOIN paliad.deadline_rules parent_rule ON parent_rule.proceeding_type_id = pt.id AND parent_rule.code = new.parent_code;
-- ============================================================================
-- 6. New rules — EPA_APP gets R.116 + Art.112a Petition for Review
-- ============================================================================
INSERT INTO paliad.deadline_rules (
proceeding_type_id, parent_id, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type,
is_mandatory, duration_value, duration_unit, timing, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en,
sequence_order, condition_flag, concept_id, legal_source, is_spawn, is_active
)
SELECT
pt.id, parent_rule.id, new.code, new.name, new.name_en, new.primary_party, new.event_type,
false, new.duration_value, new.duration_unit, 'after', new.rule_code, new.deadline_notes, new.deadline_notes_en,
new.sequence_order, NULL,
(SELECT id FROM paliad.deadline_concepts WHERE slug = new.concept_slug),
new.legal_source, false, true
FROM (VALUES
('epa_app.oral', 'epa_app.r116', 'Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung', 'Final Written Submissions before Oral Proceedings',
'both', 'filing', 0, 'months', 'R. 116 EPÜ',
'Letzte schriftliche Eingaben mindestens 1 Monat vor der mündlichen Verhandlung der Beschwerdekammer (R. 116(1) EPÜ i.V.m. Art. 13 RPBA). Kammer setzt genaues Datum mit Ladung.',
'Final written submissions at least 1 month before the oral proceedings of the Board of Appeal (R. 116(1) EPC read with Art. 13 RPBA). The Board sets the exact date in the summons.',
35, 'r116-final-submissions', 'EU.EPC-R.116.1'),
('epa_app.entsch2', 'epa_app.r106', 'Antrag auf Überprüfung', 'Petition for Review',
'both', 'filing', 2, 'months', 'Art. 112a EPÜ',
'Antrag auf Überprüfung der Beschwerdekammerentscheidung durch die Große Beschwerdekammer (Art. 112a EPÜ, R. 106-109 EPÜ) — 2 Monate ab Zustellung der Entscheidung. Beschränkt auf Verfahrensmängel.',
'Petition for review of the Board of Appeal''s decision by the Enlarged Board of Appeal (Art. 112a EPC, R. 106-109 EPC) — 2 months from service of the decision. Limited to procedural defects.',
60, 'petition-for-review', 'EU.EPÜ.112a')
) AS new(parent_code, code, name, name_en, primary_party, event_type, duration_value, duration_unit, rule_code, deadline_notes, deadline_notes_en, sequence_order, concept_slug, legal_source)
JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.code = 'EPA_APP'
JOIN paliad.deadline_rules parent_rule ON parent_rule.proceeding_type_id = pt.id AND parent_rule.code = new.parent_code;