Recovery during the prod outage uncovered a second mig 098 bug: §6.2
assertion '0 NULL submission_code on active+published rows' counted
the 77 orphan rules (proceeding_type_id IS NULL, cross-cutting
Wiedereinsetzung / Schriftsatznachreichung pattern) and rejected the
migration. Patch: gate the NULL count on `proceeding_type_id IS NOT
NULL` so orphans pass through. Migration already applied to prod via
manual recovery with the same patched assertion; this commit aligns
the in-repo file with the deployed state.
Mig 098 (t-paliad-209, ohm) crash-looped paliad.de prod for ~2h: §6.1
assertion regex `^[a-z_]+\.[a-z_]+\.[a-z_]+\.[a-z_]+(\..*)?$` rejects
EPA rule codes that carry the statutory rule number in the suffix —
e.g. `epa.opp.boa.r106`, `epa.grant.exa.r71_3`, `epa.opp.opd.r116`,
`epa.opp.opd.r79_further`, `epa.opp.boa.entsch2`, `epa.opp.boa.r116`.
Migration's UPDATE step succeeds against these rows; the transactional
assertion blows them up; rollback leaves the migration tracker dirty
at version 98 and the container refuses to start.
Patch: allow `[a-z_0-9]` per segment instead of `[a-z_]` in both the
SQL assertion (mig 098 §6.1) and the matching Go shape regex
(submission_codes_shape_test.go). Same change in both spots so the
runtime sanity test stays aligned with the SQL invariant.
Manual recovery already applied: forced
`paliad.paliad_schema_migrations.version` back to 97 with `dirty=false`
so the next deploy retries mig 098 from scratch against the patched
file. No data state changed (mig 098 ran inside a transaction and
fully rolled back — snapshot table, prefix UPDATE, and column rename
all reverted).
go build ./... clean. TestProceedingCodeShapeRegexStandalone green.
m's 2026-05-18 call (workstream B): the paliad.deadline_rules.code field
is a SUBMISSION identifier (the filing/event within a proceeding), not
the legal-citation rule code (which lives in rule_code / legal_source).
Two cleanups land in this migration:
1. DATA — prefix every existing submission code with its proceeding
code so submission codes carry the full hierarchical shape:
inf.soc (on upc.inf.cfi) → upc.inf.cfi.soc
de_inf.klage (on de.inf.lg) → de.inf.lg.klage
de_inf_bgh.revision (on de.inf.bgh) → de.inf.bgh.revision
Idempotent: WHERE NOT LIKE pt.code || '.%' skips already-prefixed
rows so re-running is a no-op.
2. SCHEMA — rename paliad.deadline_rules.code → submission_code so
future devs don't conflate it with rule_code (legal citation) or
proceeding_types.code. The rename is guarded by a column-existence
check, idempotent on a second run.
Drops + recreates the deadline_search materialized view because its
SELECT bakes `dr.code AS rule_local_code` (mig 051 §4); the rebuild
sources from `dr.submission_code` and reproduces every index from mig
051 verbatim.
Backup snapshot table paliad.deadline_rules_pre_098 captures the rows
before the prefix step; serves as the audit anchor and the down's
source.
Hard assertions (§6) gate the migration on:
- every active+published row matches the 4+-segment proceeding-prefixed
shape regex
- no NULL submission_code on active+published rows
- the column was actually renamed
