3c840c0366a6c3b5098bba4f6e71ff058aff51a7
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3c840c0366 |
fix(litigationplanner): respect trigger_event_id + suppress optional from default (yoUPC#178 + #2568/#2570)
Two paired engine semantics fixes:
1. trigger_event_id is now the authoritative semantic anchor. When a
rule carries trigger_event_id, the engine no longer falls back to
the proceeding's trigger date — it resolves the anchor via
CalcOptions.TriggerEventAnchors keyed by paliad.trigger_events.code.
Missing anchor renders the rule as IsConditional (empty date) and
propagates via courtSet so descendants also surface as conditional.
Fixes the RoP.109.5 bug where the engine fabricated a date 2 weeks
before the user's SoC instead of waiting for the oral_hearing date.
2. priority='optional' rules are suppressed from the default
Calculate output. Callers (paliad /tools/procedures,
youpc.org/deadlines) opt in via CalcOptions.IncludeOptional=true to
restore the legacy "show optional applications" behaviour. The
suppression cascades through skippedIDs so child rules drop too.
Wire shape additions:
- CalcOptions.IncludeOptional bool
- CalcOptions.TriggerEventAnchors map[string]string
- Timeline.RulesAwaitingAnchor int (count of suppressed-by-missing-
anchor rules, for caller telemetry / "N rules need an anchor" UX)
Existing before-court-set-anchor tests opt in to IncludeOptional=true
to preserve their non-optional-related test intent.
Refs: youpcorg/head delegations #2568 + #2570, m/paliad#153 (Litigation
Builder PRD path).
|
|||
| 7d7b20651d |
feat(litigationplanner): appeal-target synthetic trigger row + appeal-role stamping (t-paliad-307, m/paliad#136)
Engine side of the four Verfahrensablauf appeal bugs in m/paliad#136. Bug 2 — Missing trigger event row. When CalcOptions.AppealTarget is set, Calculate now prepends a synthetic TimelineEntry to the deadlines slice dated to the trigger date, carrying the per-appeal-target label from TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget (Endentscheidung (R.118), Kosten- entscheidung, Anordnung, Schadensbemessung, Bucheinsicht). Marked IsRootEvent + IsTriggerEvent + party=court + priority=informational so the frontend renders it as a dimmed anchor card without a save button / choices caret / click-to-edit affordance. Empty Code so it doesn't collide with real rule UUIDs downstream. Bug 1 (engine half) — Side selector dead on appeal. Every appeal filing rule carries primary_party='both' in the catalog, so the column bucketer couldn't distinguish Berufungskläger vs Berufungs- beklagter filings from primary_party alone. Engine now stamps the new TimelineEntry.AppealRole field with appellant/appellee from the rule-semantic AppealFilerRole mapping (appeal_role.go) when an appeal_target is in scope. The frontend half of the fix (next commit) consumes this to route each "both" rule into the user-perspective column once the user picks a side. Mapping covers all 12 appeal filing rules across the three applies_to_target tracks (endentscheidung/schadensbemessung, kostenentscheidung, anordnung/bucheinsicht). Court-issued events (merits.decision, merits.oral, cost.decision, order.order) stay empty — they continue to route on Party='court'. Unmapped submission_codes return empty so a new appeal rule we forgot to map falls through to the bucketer's legacy path rather than silently picking a side. Tests: TestAppealFilerRole pins the mapping; TestCalculate_Appeal SyntheticTriggerRow covers (a) synthetic row prepended + AppealRole stamped when target is set, (b) no synthetic row + no AppealRole when target is unset (regression guard), (c) unknown target short-circuits to no-op. Existing tests untouched — both behaviours gate on opts.AppealTarget != "". No DB migration — the bugs are calc-side. deadline_rules untouched. |
|||
| 2377f08bd7 | Merge: t-paliad-304 — R.109 anchor + columns-view duplicate fix (topo walk + 'both'→ours collapse) (m/paliad#135) | |||
| 1d704f6e04 |
fix(litigationplanner): R.109.1/R.109.4 mis-anchor + duplicate 'both' row in columns view (t-paliad-304, m/paliad#135)
Two bugs surfaced on /tools/verfahrensablauf?side=defendant for upc.inf.cfi:
1. Anchor regression for timing='before' children of court-set parents.
Rules R.109.1 (translation_request) and R.109.4 (interpreter_cost)
anchor on the oral hearing (parent_id=upc.inf.cfi.oral, IsCourtSet)
but were computing dates BEFORE the Statement of Claim — 1 month
resp. 2 weeks before the SoC instead of before the oral hearing.
Root cause: engine walked rules in sequence_order, and the two
"before"-timed children carry sequence_order 45/46 (their chronological
position, before the oral hearing at 50). Their parent had therefore
not been processed yet when the children were, so courtSet[oral.ID]
was still empty → parentIsCourtSet=false → the engine fell back to
the trigger date as the base.
Fix: walk rules in topological order (parent-first) during the
compute pass, then restore sequence_order on the output slice so
the wire shape and the linear timeline view's render order stay
identical to the legacy behaviour modulo the bug fix.
2. Duplicate "Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung" row in columns view.
With primary_party='both' and an explicit side pick (?side=defendant),
the bucketing mirrored the card into both 'Unsere Seite' and
'Gegnerseite' — the same card on the same row, visible as a
duplicate.
Fix: when the user has committed to a perspective (side picked)
but no appellant axis applies, collapse 'both' rows into ours.
The '↔ beide Seiten' indicator is suppressed in that path to match
the existing appellant-collapse semantics (no sibling row to mirror
to). Legacy mirror behaviour is preserved when side is null.
DB audit ruled out a data-level duplicate: exactly one published+active
row per submission_code in paliad.deadline_rules.
Tests:
- pkg/litigationplanner/before_court_set_anchor_test.go: synthetic
rules pinning the conditional-on-court-set-parent contract plus
the override path (1mo before user-pinned oral).
- frontend/src/client/views/verfahrensablauf-core.test.ts: two new
cases pinning the side-collapse routing for party='both'.
|
|||
| a75731a902 | Merge: t-paliad-302 — Verfahrensablauf duration indicator (hover + toggle, +3 lp.TimelineEntry fields) (m/paliad#133) | |||
| 3097df3918 |
mAi: #133 — Verfahrensablauf duration affordance (hover + toggle)
t-paliad-302 / m/paliad#133. Surface each event card's rule duration ("2 Mo. nach") on /tools/verfahrensablauf — by default as a hover tooltip on the date span, and optionally inline via a new "Dauern anzeigen" header toggle (localStorage key paliad.verfahrensablauf.durations-show). The issue scoped this as pure-frontend on the assumption that the duration fields were already on the /api/tools/fristenrechner payload. They were not: lp.TimelineEntry exposed only the computed dueDate, not the rule's (duration_value, duration_unit, timing) tuple. Added these as three additive optional fields and populated them in both engine emission sites (Calculate + CalculateByTriggerEvent) from the rule row directly. Source values are the base rule fields, not the post-alt-swap arithmetic — the tooltip reads as a property of the rule rather than a recap of which branch fired. Frontend wiring: - formatDurationLabel() in verfahrensablauf-core builds the "<value> <unit> <timing>" string from the existing deadlines.event.unit.<unit>.{one,many} + deadlines.event.timing.* i18n keys, reused from /tools/fristenrechner's event-mode renderer. - deadlineCardHtml attaches the label as title= on the date span (hover, default) and, when CardOpts.showDurations is on, emits an inline <span class="timeline-duration"> in the meta row. - Court-set / zero-duration rules (trigger event, hearings) skip the affordance — durationValue <= 0 short-circuits in formatDurationLabel. - Toggle persisted in localStorage under paliad.verfahrensablauf.durations-show, default off; sits next to the existing "Hinweise anzeigen" toggle. bun run build clean, go test ./pkg/litigationplanner/... and ./internal/... clean, bun test src/client/views clean (89/89). |
|||
| 9da4715137 |
feat(litigationplanner): Berufung tile UX — collapse side selectors + appeal-target trigger label (t-paliad-301, m/paliad#132)
Two bugs from the Slice B1 Berufung rollout, one fix surface:
Bug A — duplicate side selectors collapse into ONE proactive-side
picker with per-proceeding role labels. The Verfahrensablauf used to
show both ?side= (Klägerseite/Beklagtenseite) AND ?appellant= (same
labels in case-form) on the Berufung tile. Now: one side picker, with
labels that swap to Berufungskläger/Berufungsbeklagter on the unified
upc.apl.unified tile (and Antragsteller/Antragsgegner Nichtigkeit on
upc.rev.cfi, Einsprechende(r)/Patentinhaber(in) on epa.opp.*).
Bug B — 'Auslösendes Ereignis' label derives from appeal_target on
the unified Berufung tile (5 target-specific strings) instead of the
proceeding's own trigger_event_label. Endentscheidung (R.118) /
Kostenentscheidung / Anordnung / Entscheidung im
Schadensbemessungsverfahren / Anordnung der Bucheinsicht.
Migration 137 (additive, no triggers on proceeding_types — verified
via mcp__supabase__execute_sql before drafting; no updated_at on the
table — lesson from mig 134 HOTFIX 3; no audit_reason setup needed):
- ADD COLUMN role_proactive_label_de (text NULL)
- ADD COLUMN role_proactive_label_en (text NULL)
- ADD COLUMN role_reactive_label_de (text NULL)
- ADD COLUMN role_reactive_label_en (text NULL)
- Audit-first DO block lists the rows the UPDATE will touch.
- Backfill 4 proceedings (upc.apl.unified + upc.rev.cfi +
epa.opp.opd + epa.opp.boa); every other proceeding stays NULL
and the renderer falls back to default labels.
- Down drops the 4 columns.
Package additions (pkg/litigationplanner):
- ProceedingType gains 4 *string fields (RoleProactive/Reactive
LabelDE/EN) — db tags match the new columns; existing scans pick
them up via the proceedingTypeColumns extension.
- TriggerEventLabelForAppealTarget(target, lang) — Go-side map of
the 5 appeal-target slugs to their DE/EN trigger-event labels.
Empty result on unknown target signals "fall back to proceeding's
own trigger_event_label".
- Engine override: when CalcOptions.AppealTarget is set, the
resulting Timeline.TriggerEventLabel/EN are replaced from the
per-target map.
Frontend:
- Removed #appellant-row div (was a separate 3-radio selector
duplicating side).
- Dropped ?appellant= URL state + the change handler + the init
readback. The engine still consumes "appellant" — sourced from
currentSide for role-swap proceedings; null otherwise.
- applyRoleLabels(proceedingType) swaps the side-row radio labels
from a hardcoded ROLE_LABELS map mirroring mig 137's backfill.
Falls back to deadlines.side.claimant/defendant i18n keys for
proceedings without overrides.
- syncTriggerEventLabel reads data.triggerEventLabel from the calc
response — which the engine override now sets per appeal_target,
so no client-side mapping needed.
- i18n cleanup: removed orphan deadlines.appellant.* keys (label /
claimant / defendant / none) in both DE + EN.
Tests:
- pkg/litigationplanner/appeal_target_label_test.go pins the 5×2
label matrix + a coverage test that fails if a new entry in
AppealTargets is added without populating the label switch.
Acceptance:
- go build + go test all green (incl. new lp test).
- bun run build clean (i18n codegen drops 4 keys, regenerates).
- Live-DB audit before drafting confirmed: 4 target columns don't
exist on proceeding_types, zero triggers on the table, exact
column inventory matches the design.
|
|||
| 07acf7b4a2 |
feat(litigationplanner): Berufung unification — one upc.apl + 5 appeal_target chips (Slice B1, m/paliad#124 §18.1)
Collapses the 3 UPC appeal proceeding_types (upc.apl.merits 7 rules,
upc.apl.cost 2, upc.apl.order 7 = 16 total across 3 codes) into ONE
unified upc.apl proceeding type + a per-rule applies_to_target[]
discriminator. The verfahrensablauf picker now shows one "Berufung"
tile; after picking it, the user selects which decision the appeal is
directed AT via a 5-chip group (Endentscheidung / Kostenentscheidung /
Anordnung / Schadensbemessung / Bucheinsicht) and the engine filters
rules whose applies_to_target contains the picked slug.
m's 2026-05-26 decision: Schadensbemessung-as-appeal is a NEW first-
class target with its OWN rule set (no shared inheritance from
merits). The 5 enum values are all defined + addressable; for now
schadensbemessung and bucheinsicht return empty timelines until rules
are seeded in a follow-up slice (likely via /admin/rules or pairing
with t-paliad-193 orphan-concept-seed).
Migration 134 (additive only):
- ADD proceeding_types.appeal_target text (CHECK on 5 slugs OR NULL)
- ADD deadline_rules.applies_to_target text[] (CHECK each element
in the 5 slugs)
- INSERT the unified upc.apl row (inherits sort/color from
upc.apl.merits)
- Audit-first RAISE NOTICE pass listing every row about to be
touched + a post-migration sanity check
- Reassign rule rows: merits → applies_to_target={endentscheidung},
cost → {kostenentscheidung}, order → {anordnung}
- Archive (is_active=false, NOT DELETE) the 3 old proceeding_types
so historical FKs stay intact
- Down migration restores is_active=true on the 3 old types, points
rules back by their applies_to_target stamp, drops the unified
row, drops both columns. Safe.
Package additions (pkg/litigationplanner):
- AppealTarget* constants + AppealTargets[] ordered list +
IsValidAppealTarget(s) predicate (silent no-op on unknown slugs
so a stale frontend chip doesn't break the render)
- ProceedingType.AppealTarget *string field (top-level marker;
NULL on non-appeal proceedings)
- Rule.AppliesToTarget pq.StringArray field (per-row applies-to set)
- CalcOptions.AppealTarget string (engine filter — when set,
keeps only rules whose AppliesToTarget contains the slug)
Engine filter runs after ApplyRuleOverrides but before the rule walk
so the existing condition_expr / spawn / appellant-context machinery
operates on the filtered subset transparently.
paliad-side wiring:
- deadline_rule_service.go: ruleColumns + proceedingTypeColumns
extended to scan the new columns
- handlers/fristenrechner.go: AppealTarget JSON field on the
request payload, threaded into CalcOptions
Frontend (verfahrensablauf surface only):
- Single "Berufung" tile replaces the 3 separate Berufung tiles
- New 5-chip appeal-target row, shown only when upc.apl is picked
- URL state ?target=<slug>; default endentscheidung when none set
- APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS updated: upc.apl.* (3 entries) →
upc.apl (1 entry)
- i18n keys (DE + EN) for the new tile + the 5 chip labels +
the "Worauf richtet sich die Berufung?" / "Appeal against:" prompt
- calculateDeadlines threads appealTarget through to the API
Acceptance:
- go build clean, go test all green (existing test suite — no new
tests on the engine filter as a follow-up; the migration's
sanity-check DO block guards the rule-reassignment count)
- Live audit before drafting confirmed: 3 active UPC appeal
proceeding_types, 16 rules total, primary_party already conforms
to 4-value vocab on all proceeding-bound rules
|
|||
| 5f0a85fa83 |
refactor(litigationplanner): extract Fristen/Verfahrensablauf calc into pkg/litigationplanner (Slice A, t-paliad-298 / m/paliad#124)
Atomic extraction of the deadline-rule compute engine + types from
internal/services into a new pkg/litigationplanner package that paliad
+ youpc.org can both import. No behaviour change — every existing test
passes against the post-move shape.
Package contents (~1850 LoC):
- doc.go package docstring + reuse manifesto
- types.go Rule, ProceedingType, NullableJSON, AdjustmentReason,
HolidayDTO, CalcOptions, CalcRuleParams, Timeline,
TimelineEntry, RuleCalculation*, FristenrechnerType,
ProjectHint, sentinel errors
- catalog.go Catalog interface (proceeding + rule lookups)
- holidays.go HolidayCalendar interface
- courts.go CourtRegistry interface + DefaultsForJurisdiction +
country/regime constants
- expr.go EvalConditionExpr + HasConditionExpr +
ExtractFlagsFromExpr (jsonb gate evaluator)
- durations.go ApplyDuration + AddWorkingDays (pure compute)
- subtrack.go SubTrackRouting + LookupSubTrackRouting registry
- legal_source.go FormatLegalSourceDisplay + BuildLegalSourceURL
- proceeding_mapping.go MapLitigationToFristenrechner + code constants
(CodeUPCInfringement, CodeDEInfringementLG, ...)
- engine.go Calculate + CalculateRule + the trigger-event
branch + applyRuleOverrides (the big move)
paliad side (~1900 LoC net deletion):
- internal/services/fristenrechner.go shrinks from 1505 → ~290 lines
(thin paliad Catalog adapter + type aliases for back-compat).
- internal/models/models.go: DeadlineRule, ProceedingType, NullableJSON
become type aliases to litigationplanner.* — every sqlx scan and
every projection_service caller compiles unchanged.
- internal/services/holidays.go: AdjustmentReason + HolidayDTO become
aliases to lp.* (canonical definitions now in the package).
- internal/services/proceeding_mapping.go: rewritten as thin re-exports
of lp constants + helpers.
- internal/services/deadline_search_service.go: FormatLegalSourceDisplay
+ BuildLegalSourceURL replaced with delegating wrappers to lp.
Catalog interface satisfaction:
- DeadlineRuleService → paliadCatalog adapter (wraps the existing
service, replicates the original SELECT shapes).
- HolidayService → satisfies lp.HolidayCalendar directly (compile-
time assertion at end of fristenrechner.go).
- CourtService → satisfies lp.CourtRegistry directly.
Wire shape is byte-identical. JSON tags on Rule / ProceedingType /
Timeline / TimelineEntry / RuleCalculation match the historical
UIResponse / UIDeadline shape; the frontend reads the same bytes.
Slice B (Catalog interface + paliad loader cleanup) is folded into
this commit since Slice A already needs the interfaces to call
Calculate across the boundary. Slice C (embedded UPC snapshot +
generator) is the next coder shift; the Berufung unification m
called out lands in Slice B/C per head's brief.
Refs: docs/design-litigation-planner-2026-05-26.md
|
