07acf7b4a216e9e64c89fdb93e08dbf0fb6e8983
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07acf7b4a2 |
feat(litigationplanner): Berufung unification — one upc.apl + 5 appeal_target chips (Slice B1, m/paliad#124 §18.1)
Collapses the 3 UPC appeal proceeding_types (upc.apl.merits 7 rules,
upc.apl.cost 2, upc.apl.order 7 = 16 total across 3 codes) into ONE
unified upc.apl proceeding type + a per-rule applies_to_target[]
discriminator. The verfahrensablauf picker now shows one "Berufung"
tile; after picking it, the user selects which decision the appeal is
directed AT via a 5-chip group (Endentscheidung / Kostenentscheidung /
Anordnung / Schadensbemessung / Bucheinsicht) and the engine filters
rules whose applies_to_target contains the picked slug.
m's 2026-05-26 decision: Schadensbemessung-as-appeal is a NEW first-
class target with its OWN rule set (no shared inheritance from
merits). The 5 enum values are all defined + addressable; for now
schadensbemessung and bucheinsicht return empty timelines until rules
are seeded in a follow-up slice (likely via /admin/rules or pairing
with t-paliad-193 orphan-concept-seed).
Migration 134 (additive only):
- ADD proceeding_types.appeal_target text (CHECK on 5 slugs OR NULL)
- ADD deadline_rules.applies_to_target text[] (CHECK each element
in the 5 slugs)
- INSERT the unified upc.apl row (inherits sort/color from
upc.apl.merits)
- Audit-first RAISE NOTICE pass listing every row about to be
touched + a post-migration sanity check
- Reassign rule rows: merits → applies_to_target={endentscheidung},
cost → {kostenentscheidung}, order → {anordnung}
- Archive (is_active=false, NOT DELETE) the 3 old proceeding_types
so historical FKs stay intact
- Down migration restores is_active=true on the 3 old types, points
rules back by their applies_to_target stamp, drops the unified
row, drops both columns. Safe.
Package additions (pkg/litigationplanner):
- AppealTarget* constants + AppealTargets[] ordered list +
IsValidAppealTarget(s) predicate (silent no-op on unknown slugs
so a stale frontend chip doesn't break the render)
- ProceedingType.AppealTarget *string field (top-level marker;
NULL on non-appeal proceedings)
- Rule.AppliesToTarget pq.StringArray field (per-row applies-to set)
- CalcOptions.AppealTarget string (engine filter — when set,
keeps only rules whose AppliesToTarget contains the slug)
Engine filter runs after ApplyRuleOverrides but before the rule walk
so the existing condition_expr / spawn / appellant-context machinery
operates on the filtered subset transparently.
paliad-side wiring:
- deadline_rule_service.go: ruleColumns + proceedingTypeColumns
extended to scan the new columns
- handlers/fristenrechner.go: AppealTarget JSON field on the
request payload, threaded into CalcOptions
Frontend (verfahrensablauf surface only):
- Single "Berufung" tile replaces the 3 separate Berufung tiles
- New 5-chip appeal-target row, shown only when upc.apl is picked
- URL state ?target=<slug>; default endentscheidung when none set
- APPELLANT_AXIS_PROCEEDINGS updated: upc.apl.* (3 entries) →
upc.apl (1 entry)
- i18n keys (DE + EN) for the new tile + the 5 chip labels +
the "Worauf richtet sich die Berufung?" / "Appeal against:" prompt
- calculateDeadlines threads appealTarget through to the API
Acceptance:
- go build clean, go test all green (existing test suite — no new
tests on the engine filter as a follow-up; the migration's
sanity-check DO block guards the rule-reassignment count)
- Live audit before drafting confirmed: 3 active UPC appeal
proceeding_types, 16 rules total, primary_party already conforms
to 4-value vocab on all proceeding-bound rules
|
