Four open questions answered via AskUserQuestion (2026-05-25):
Q1 State location → persisted table (matches (R))
Q2 Affordance → caret + popover (matches (R))
Q3 Appellant layer → per-card overrides (matches (R))
Q4 Slice order → bundle A + B (over (R) of "A first")
Q4 captured with rationale: cohesive PR, single user-visible release,
no half-shipped state where the include-CCR popover would exist
without the engine wire-through. Coder still organises commits per
slice internally; one branch, one ship.
Draft inventor design for m/paliad#96 — per-card affordances driving
projection state: appellant per decision, include-CCR on Klageerwiderung,
skip optional events.
Persisted choices in new paliad.project_event_choices table; opt-in
declared via choices_offered jsonb on paliad.deadline_rules. Caret +
popover affordance; chip indicators on cards with non-default picks.
Two-slice plan: A=appellant+skip (engine-stable), B=include-CCR.
m's decisions section to be filled after the AskUserQuestion round.
