Merge: t-paliad-348 — port engine semantics to TS calc + manuscript regen (m/paliad#153)

exports/gen-deadline-list.py

@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Generate a markdown deadline-list export for UPC PA training (work/head delegation #2572).
+
+Sorts by proceeding-type display_order then sequence_order. Sections by proceeding.
+
+t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178 update: matches the engine's `IncludeOptional=false`
+default (`pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go`). Optional rules (priority='optional')
+are SUPPRESSED by default so the manuscript shows the same "naked proceeding
+backbone" the UI now renders. Pass `--include-optional` to opt back in for an
+exhaustive catalog dump.
+
+Usage:
+    uv run exports/gen-deadline-list.py [--include-optional] [-o OUT]
+"""
+# /// script
+# requires-python = ">=3.10"
+# dependencies = ["psycopg2-binary"]
+# ///
+import argparse
+import os
+import sys
+from datetime import date
+from pathlib import Path
+
+import psycopg2
+import psycopg2.extras
+
+DSN = os.environ.get(
+    "PALIAD_DEADLINE_EXPORT_DSN",
+    "postgres://postgres:rpsak3yf4lu1izgefx9p9xweg3qroojw@100.99.98.201:11833/postgres?sslmode=disable",
+)
+
+# `priority` filter is wired at the SQL level (not post-filter in Python) so
+# the row counter in the markdown header reflects what's actually in the
+# manuscript — matching what the lawyer sees on /tools/procedures.
+SQL_TEMPLATE = """
+SELECT
+  pt.code AS pt_code,
+  pt.display_order,
+  COALESCE(pt.name_en, pt.name) AS pt_label_en,
+  pt.name AS pt_label_de,
+  COALESCE(pe.name_en, pe.name) AS event_en,
+  pe.name AS event_de,
+  sr.duration_value,
+  sr.duration_unit,
+  sr.timing,
+  sr.alt_duration_value,
+  sr.alt_duration_unit,
+  sr.combine_op,
+  sr.rule_code,
+  COALESCE(te.name, te.name_de) AS trigger_label,
+  te.code AS trigger_code,
+  sr.primary_party,
+  sr.is_court_set,
+  sr.is_spawn,
+  sr.priority,
+  sr.deadline_notes_en,
+  sr.deadline_notes,
+  sr.condition_expr,
+  sr.sequence_order
+FROM paliad.sequencing_rules sr
+JOIN paliad.procedural_events pe ON pe.id = sr.procedural_event_id
+LEFT JOIN paliad.proceeding_types pt ON pt.id = sr.proceeding_type_id
+LEFT JOIN paliad.trigger_events te ON te.id = sr.trigger_event_id
+WHERE sr.lifecycle_state = 'published'
+  AND sr.is_active = true
+  AND pt.id IS NOT NULL
+  {priority_filter}
+ORDER BY pt.display_order NULLS LAST, pt.code, sr.sequence_order NULLS LAST, sr.rule_code, pe.name;
+"""
+
+
+def format_frist(duration_value, duration_unit, timing, alt_value, alt_unit, combine_op):
+    """Format the deadline duration cleanly."""
+    if duration_value is None or duration_unit is None:
+        return ""
+    unit_map = {
+        "days": "d",
+        "weeks": "w",
+        "months": "M",
+        "years": "y",
+        "calendar_days": "CD",
+        "working_days": "WD",
+    }
+    unit = unit_map.get(duration_unit, duration_unit)
+    main = f"{duration_value} {unit}"
+    if alt_value is not None and alt_unit is not None:
+        alt_unit_short = unit_map.get(alt_unit, alt_unit)
+        op = combine_op or "or"
+        main = f"{main} {op} {alt_value} {alt_unit_short}"
+    if timing == "before":
+        main = f"{main} before"
+    elif timing == "after":
+        main = f"{main} after"
+    return main
+
+
+def format_party(primary_party, is_court_set):
+    if is_court_set:
+        return "court-set"
+    if primary_party == "claimant":
+        return "claimant"
+    if primary_party == "defendant":
+        return "defendant"
+    if primary_party == "both":
+        return "either"
+    if primary_party == "court":
+        return "court"
+    return primary_party or "—"
+
+
+def detect_r94(notes_en, notes_de):
+    """Flag R.9.4 non-extendable from notes text (heuristic — no DB field)."""
+    blobs = " ".join(filter(None, [notes_en or "", notes_de or ""])).lower()
+    if "r.9.4" in blobs or "r 9.4" in blobs or "r9.4" in blobs:
+        return "✗"
+    if "non-extendable" in blobs or "nicht verlängerbar" in blobs or "nicht verlaengerbar" in blobs:
+        return "✗"
+    return ""
+
+
+def conditional_marker(condition_expr):
+    if condition_expr in (None, "", {}):
+        return ""
+    # condition_expr is JSONB → returns dict
+    if isinstance(condition_expr, dict):
+        if "flag" in condition_expr:
+            return f"if `{condition_expr['flag']}`"
+        if condition_expr.get("op") == "and" and "args" in condition_expr:
+            flags = [a.get("flag", "?") for a in condition_expr["args"]]
+            return "if " + " & ".join(f"`{f}`" for f in flags)
+        if condition_expr.get("op") == "or" and "args" in condition_expr:
+            flags = [a.get("flag", "?") for a in condition_expr["args"]]
+            return "if " + " | ".join(f"`{f}`" for f in flags)
+    return "cond"
+
+
+def md_escape(s):
+    if s is None:
+        return ""
+    return str(s).replace("|", "\\|").replace("\n", " ")
+
+
+def render(rows, *, include_optional: bool, generated_for: str) -> str:
+    by_pt = {}
+    for r in rows:
+        key = (r["display_order"] or 9999, r["pt_code"], r["pt_label_de"], r["pt_label_en"])
+        by_pt.setdefault(key, []).append(r)
+
+    out = []
+    today = date.today().isoformat()
+    out.append(f"# UPC + DE/EP Deadline Catalog — Stand {today}")
+    out.append("")
+    out.append(f"Source: `paliad.sequencing_rules` (lifecycle_state=published, is_active=true).")
+    out.append(f"Generated for {generated_for}. {len(rows)} rules across {len(by_pt)} proceedings.")
+    if include_optional:
+        out.append("")
+        out.append(
+            "**Mode:** `--include-optional` — every published rule, including "
+            "`priority='optional'` rules suppressed by the engine's default "
+            "(`IncludeOptional=false`). This is the exhaustive catalog dump."
+        )
+    else:
+        out.append("")
+        out.append(
+            "**Mode:** default — matches the engine's `IncludeOptional=false` "
+            "behaviour (pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go). `priority='optional'` "
+            "rules are suppressed; the manuscript shows only the mandatory "
+            "backbone the lawyer sees by default on /tools/procedures. "
+            "Re-run with `--include-optional` for the full catalog. "
+            "(t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178)"
+        )
+    out.append("")
+    out.append("**Spalten:**")
+    out.append("- **Phase/Event** = procedural event (German primary)")
+    out.append("- **Frist** = duration + timing (`d` days, `w` weeks, `M` months, `CD` calendar days, `WD` working days; `before` = relative to anchor)")
+    out.append("- **Rule** = legal source (RoP / § ZPO / § PatG / Art. EPÜ)")
+    out.append("- **Anchor** = trigger event the deadline runs from")
+    out.append("- **Seite** = filing party (claimant / defendant / either / court-set)")
+    out.append("- **Priorität** = mandatory / recommended / optional / informational (only when `--include-optional`)")
+    out.append("- **R.9.4** = ✗ marked non-extendable in notes (heuristic — confirm against rule text)")
+    out.append("- **Bedingung** = scenario flag(s) that must be set for the rule to fire (blank = always)")
+    out.append("")
+    out.append("---")
+    out.append("")
+
+    for (order, pt_code, pt_de, pt_en) in sorted(by_pt.keys()):
+        prules = by_pt[(order, pt_code, pt_de, pt_en)]
+        out.append(f"## {pt_de} · `{pt_code}`")
+        out.append("")
+        if pt_en and pt_en != pt_de:
+            out.append(f"*{pt_en}*")
+            out.append("")
+        if include_optional:
+            out.append("| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | Priorität | R.9.4 | Bedingung |")
+            out.append("|---:|---|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|")
+        else:
+            out.append("| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |")
+            out.append("|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|")
+        for i, r in enumerate(prules, 1):
+            event = md_escape(r["event_de"] or r["event_en"] or "")
+            frist = md_escape(
+                format_frist(
+                    r["duration_value"], r["duration_unit"], r["timing"],
+                    r["alt_duration_value"], r["alt_duration_unit"], r["combine_op"],
+                )
+            )
+            rule = md_escape(r["rule_code"] or "")
+            anchor = md_escape(r["trigger_label"] or "")
+            party = format_party(r["primary_party"], r["is_court_set"])
+            r94 = detect_r94(r["deadline_notes_en"], r["deadline_notes"])
+            cond = md_escape(conditional_marker(r["condition_expr"]))
+            spawn_marker = " ⤴" if r["is_spawn"] else ""
+            if include_optional:
+                priority = md_escape(r["priority"] or "")
+                out.append(
+                    f"| {i} | {event}{spawn_marker} | {frist} | {rule} | {anchor} | {party} | {priority} | {r94} | {cond} |"
+                )
+            else:
+                out.append(
+                    f"| {i} | {event}{spawn_marker} | {frist} | {rule} | {anchor} | {party} | {r94} | {cond} |"
+                )
+        out.append("")
+
+    out.append("---")
+    out.append("")
+    out.append("**Lesehilfe:**")
+    out.append("- ⤴ Spawn-Marker: event opens a sub-proceeding (e.g. CCR forks revocation track)")
+    out.append("- `with_ccr` = Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit gefilt | `with_amend` = Patentänderungsantrag | `with_cci` = Widerklage auf Verletzung (in rev.cfi)")
+    out.append("- Catalog ist work-in-progress: 7 compound-name rules + Patentänderung-Duplikation noch in m's split-review backlog (m/paliad#149).")
+    return "\n".join(out)
+
+
+def main():
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--include-optional",
+        action="store_true",
+        help="Include priority='optional' rules. Default false matches the engine's IncludeOptional=false default.",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "-o",
+        "--out",
+        default="exports/upc-deadlines-2026-05-28.md",
+        help="Output path (relative to repo root).",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--generated-for",
+        default="PA-Schulung 2026-05-28",
+        help="Free-text label rendered in the markdown header.",
+    )
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    priority_filter = "" if args.include_optional else "AND sr.priority != 'optional'"
+    sql = SQL_TEMPLATE.format(priority_filter=priority_filter)
+
+    conn = psycopg2.connect(DSN)
+    try:
+        cur = conn.cursor(cursor_factory=psycopg2.extras.RealDictCursor)
+        cur.execute(sql)
+        rows = cur.fetchall()
+    finally:
+        conn.close()
+
+    md = render(rows, include_optional=args.include_optional, generated_for=args.generated_for)
+    # Resolve out path relative to the repo root (= the script's grandparent).
+    out_path = Path(args.out)
+    if not out_path.is_absolute():
+        out_path = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent / out_path
+    out_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+    out_path.write_text(md)
+    n_pt = len({(r["display_order"] or 9999, r["pt_code"]) for r in rows})
+    print(
+        f"WROTE {out_path} ({len(rows)} rules, {n_pt} proceedings, "
+        f"include_optional={args.include_optional})"
+    )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())

exports/upc-deadlines-2026-05-28.md

@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+# UPC + DE/EP Deadline Catalog — Stand 2026-05-28
+
+Source: `paliad.sequencing_rules` (lifecycle_state=published, is_active=true).
+Generated for PA-Schulung 2026-05-28. 178 rules across 25 proceedings.
+
+**Mode:** default — matches the engine's `IncludeOptional=false` behaviour (pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go). `priority='optional'` rules are suppressed; the manuscript shows only the mandatory backbone the lawyer sees by default on /tools/procedures. Re-run with `--include-optional` for the full catalog. (t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178)
+
+**Spalten:**
+- **Phase/Event** = procedural event (German primary)
+- **Frist** = duration + timing (`d` days, `w` weeks, `M` months, `CD` calendar days, `WD` working days; `before` = relative to anchor)
+- **Rule** = legal source (RoP / § ZPO / § PatG / Art. EPÜ)
+- **Anchor** = trigger event the deadline runs from
+- **Seite** = filing party (claimant / defendant / either / court-set)
+- **Priorität** = mandatory / recommended / optional / informational (only when `--include-optional`)
+- **R.9.4** = ✗ marked non-extendable in notes (heuristic — confirm against rule text)
+- **Bedingung** = scenario flag(s) that must be set for the rule to fire (blank = always)
+
+---
+
+## Verletzungsverfahren · `upc.inf.cfi`
+
+*Infringement Action*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Klageerhebung | 0 M after | RoP.013.1 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Klageerwiderung | 3 M after | RoP.023 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Replik | 2 M or 2 M after | RoP.029.b |  | claimant |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 4 | Duplik | 1 M or 2 M after | RoP.029.c |  | defendant |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 5 | Erwiderung auf Nichtigkeitswiderklage | 2 M after | RoP.029.a |  | claimant |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 6 | Replik auf Erwiderung zur Nichtigkeitswiderklage | 2 M after | RoP.029.d |  | defendant |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 7 | Duplik auf Replik zur Erwiderung Nichtigkeitswiderklage | 1 M after | RoP.029.e |  | claimant |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 8 | Antrag auf Patentänderung | 2 M after | RoP.030.1 |  | claimant |  | if `with_ccr` & `with_amend` |
+| 9 | Erwiderung auf Patentänderungsantrag | 2 M after | RoP.032.1 |  | defendant |  | if `with_ccr` & `with_amend` |
+| 10 | Replik auf Erwiderung zum Patentänderungsantrag | 1 M after | RoP.032.3 |  | claimant |  | if `with_ccr` & `with_amend` |
+| 11 | Duplik auf Replik zum Patentänderungsantrag | 1 M after | RoP.032.3 |  | defendant |  | if `with_ccr` & `with_amend` |
+| 12 | Zwischenanhörung | 0 M after | RoP.105 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 13 | Mitteilung Dolmetscherkosten | 2 w before | RoP.109.4 | Oral hearing | court |  |  |
+| 14 | Übersetzungen einreichen | 2 w after | RoP.109.5 |  | either |  |  |
+| 15 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | RoP.112 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 16 | Entscheidung | 0 M after | RoP.118.1 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 17 | Duplik zur Replik auf die Erwiderung zum Patentänderungsantrag | 1 M after | RoP.032.3 | Reply to the Defence to an Application to amend the patent | defendant |  | if `with_ccr` & `with_amend` |
+| 18 | Einreichung von Übersetzungen von Schriftstücken | 1 M after | RoP.007.4 | Order of the judge-rapporteur to lodge translations | either |  |  |
+| 19 | Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung | 1 M before | RoP.109.5 | Oral hearing | either |  |  |
+| 20 | Antrag auf Folgemaßnahmen aus einer rechtskräftigen Validitätsentscheidung | 2 M after | RoP.118.4 | Final decision of the central division, Court of Appeal or EPO on the validity of the patent | either |  | if `with_ccr` |
+| 21 | Antrag auf Überprüfung einer verfahrensleitenden Anordnung | 15 d after | RoP.333 | Case management order (Service) | either |  |  |
+| 22 | Mängelbeseitigung / Einreichung schriftlicher Stellungnahme | 14 d after | RoP.019 | Preliminary Objection | either |  |  |
+| 23 | Mängelbeseitigung / Zahlung | 14 d after | RoP.016 | Notification by the Registry to correct deficiencies | either |  |  |
+| 24 | Antrag auf Verweisung an die Zentralkammer | 10 d after | RoP.323 | Information by the Court not to approve Application to use the patent's language as language of the proceedings | either |  |  |
+| 25 | Mitteilung über Beauftragung eines Dolmetschers auf Kosten der Partei | 2 w before | RoP.109.5 | Oral hearing | either |  |  |
+| 26 | Klärung von Übersetzungsfragen | 2 w after | RoP.109 | Summons to Oral Hearing | court |  |  |
+| 27 | Antrag auf Vertraulichkeit gegenüber der Öffentlichkeit | 14 d after | RoP.262.2 | Opponent Submission | either |  |  |
+| 28 | Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (UPC R.320) | 2 M after | RoP.320 | Removal of obstacle (UPC R.320) | either |  |  |
+
+## Verletzungsverfahren (LG) · `de.inf.lg`
+
+*Infringement (Regional Court)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Klageerhebung | 0 M after | § 253 ZPO |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Anzeige der Verteidigungsbereitschaft | 2 w after | § 276 ZPO |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Klageerwiderung | 6 w after | § 276 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | Replik | 4 w after | § 282 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Duplik | 4 w after | § 282 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | Haupttermin | 0 M after | § 279 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 7 | Urteil | 0 M after | § 300 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 8 | Berufungsfrist | 1 M after | § 517 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 9 | Berufungsbegründung | 2 M after | § 520 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 10 | Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (§ 233 ZPO) | 2 w after | § 233 ZPO | Removal of obstacle (ZPO §233) | — |  |  |
+| 11 | Einspruch gegen Versäumnisurteil (§ 339 ZPO) | 2 w after | § 339 ZPO | Service of default judgment | — |  |  |
+| 12 | Schriftsatznachreichung (§ 296a ZPO) | 3 w after | § 296a ZPO | End of oral hearing | — |  |  |
+
+## Nichtigkeitsverfahren · `upc.rev.cfi`
+
+*Revocation Action*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Nichtigkeitsklage | 0 M after | RoP.044 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Klageerwiderung | 2 M after | RoP.049.1 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Antrag auf Patentänderung | 0 M after | RoP.049.2.a |  | defendant |  | if `with_amend` |
+| 4 | Verletzungswiderklage | 0 M after | RoP.049.2.b |  | defendant |  | if `with_cci` |
+| 5 | Replik | 2 M after | RoP.051 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 6 | Erwiderung auf Patentänderungsantrag | 2 M after | RoP.043.3 |  | claimant |  | if `with_amend` |
+| 7 | Erwiderung auf Verletzungswiderklage | 2 M after | RoP.056.1 |  | claimant |  | if `with_cci` |
+| 8 | Duplik | 1 M after | RoP.052 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 9 | Replik auf Erwiderung zum Patentänderungsantrag | 1 M after | RoP.032.3 |  | defendant |  | if `with_amend` |
+| 10 | Replik auf Erwiderung zur Verletzungswiderklage | 1 M after | RoP.056.3 |  | defendant |  | if `with_cci` |
+| 11 | Duplik auf Replik zum Patentänderungsantrag | 1 M after | RoP.032.3 |  | claimant |  | if `with_amend` |
+| 12 | Duplik auf Replik zur Erwiderung Verletzungswiderklage | 1 M after | RoP.056.4 |  | claimant |  | if `with_cci` |
+| 13 | Zwischenanhörung | 0 M after | RoP.105 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 14 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | RoP.112 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 15 | Entscheidung | 0 M after | RoP.118.3 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 16 | Duplik zur Replik auf die Erwiderung zur Nichtigkeitsklage | 1 M after | RoP.052 | Reply to the Defence to revocation | — |  |  |
+| 17 | Verletzungswiderklage | 2 M after | RoP.053 | Statement for Revocation | — |  |  |
+| 18 | Antrag auf Patentänderung | 2 M after | RoP.050 | Statement for Revocation | — |  |  |
+
+## Nichtigkeitsverfahren (BPatG) · `de.null.bpatg`
+
+*Nullity (Federal Patent Court)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Nichtigkeitsklage | 0 M after | § 81 PatG |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Klageerwiderung | 2 M after | § 82 Abs. 3 PatG |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Replik | 2 M after | § 83 PatG |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 4 | Hinweisbeschluss | 0 M after | § 83 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Stellungnahme zum Hinweisbeschluss | 0 M after | § 83 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 6 | Duplik | 1 M after | § 83 PatG |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 7 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | § 80 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 8 | Urteil | 0 M after | § 84 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 9 | Berufungsfrist | 1 M after | § 110 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 10 | Berufungsbegründung | 3 M after | § 111 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 11 | Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (§ 123 PatG) | 2 M after | § 123 PatG | Removal of obstacle (PatG §123) | — |  |  |
+
+## Einspruchsverfahren · `epa.opp.opd`
+
+*Opposition Proceedings*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Veröffentlichung der Erteilung | 0 M after | Art. 97 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Einspruchsfrist | 9 M after | Art. 99 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Erwiderung des Patentinhabers | 4 M after | R. 79(1) EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | Entscheidung | 0 M after | Art. 102 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Beschwerdefrist | 2 M after | Art. 108 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 6 | Beschwerdebegründung | 4 M after | Art. 108 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 7 | Stellungnahme weiterer Beteiligter | 0 M after | R. 79 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 8 | Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung | 0 M after | R. 116 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 9 | Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (Art. 122 EPÜ) | 2 M after | Art. 122 EPÜ | Removal of obstacle (EPC Art.122) | — |  |  |
+
+## Beschwerdeverfahren · `epa.opp.boa`
+
+*Appeal Proceedings*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung der Beschwerdeentscheidung | 0 M after | R. 124 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Beschwerdeeinlegung | 2 M after | Art. 108 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Beschwerdebegründung | 4 M after | Art. 108 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Beschwerdeerwiderung | 4 M after | RPBA Art. 12 |  | either |  |  |
+| 5 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | Art. 116 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | Entscheidung | 0 M after | Art. 111 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 7 | Eingaben vor mündl. Verhandlung | 0 M after | R. 116 EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+| 8 | Antrag auf Überprüfung | 2 M after | Art. 112a EPÜ |  | either |  |  |
+
+## Einspruchsverfahren DPMA · `dpma.opp.dpma`
+
+*Opposition DPMA*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Veröffentlichung der Erteilung | 0 M after | § 58 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Einspruchsfrist | 9 M after | § 59 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Erwiderung des Patentinhabers | 4 M after | § 59(2) PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | DPMA-Entscheidung | 0 M after | § 61 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (DPMA) | 2 M after | § 123 PatG | Removal of obstacle (DPMA, PatG §123) | — |  |  |
+
+## Berufungsverfahren · `upc.apl.merits`
+
+*Appeal*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Berufungseinlegung | 2 M after | RoP.224.1.a |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Berufungsbegründung | 4 M after | RoP.224.2.a |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Berufungserwiderung | 3 M after | RoP.235.1 |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | RoP.240 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Entscheidung | 0 M after | RoP.235.4 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | Anschlussberufung | 3 M after | RoP.237 |  | either |  |  |
+| 7 | Erwiderung Anschlussberufung | 2 M after | RoP.238.1 |  | either |  |  |
+| 8 | Berufungsschrift gegen eine in Regel 220.1(a) und (b) genannte Entscheidung | 2 M after | RoP.224.1(a) | Decision referred to in Rule 220.1(a) and (b) | — |  |  |
+| 9 | Berufungsbegründung gegen eine in Regel 220.1(a) und (b) genannte Entscheidung | 4 M after | RoP.224.1(a) | Decision referred to in Rule 220.1(a) and (b) | — |  |  |
+| 10 | Anfechtung einer Entscheidung über die Verwerfung der Berufung als unzulässig | 1 M after | RoP.245 | Decision to reject an appeal as inadmissible | — |  |  |
+| 11 | Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme (schwerwiegender Verfahrensmangel) | 2 M after | RoP.247.2 | Final decision (Service) / Discovery of the fundamental defect (whichever is later) | — |  |  |
+| 12 | Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme (Straftat) | 2 M after | RoP.247.1 | Final decision (Service) / Court decision on criminal offence (whichever is later) | — |  |  |
+
+## Berufungsverfahren OLG (Verletzung) · `de.inf.olg`
+
+*Appeal OLG (Infringement)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung LG-Urteil | 0 M after | § 540 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Berufungsschrift | 1 M after | § 517 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Berufungsbegründung | 2 M after | § 520 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Berufungserwiderung | 1 M after | § 521 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 5 | Anschlussberufung | 0 M after | § 524 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 6 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | § 540 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 7 | OLG-Urteil | 0 M after | § 540 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## Revisions-/NZB-Verfahren BGH (Verletzung) · `de.inf.bgh`
+
+*Revision / Non-admission Appeal BGH (Infringement)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung OLG-Urteil | 0 M after | § 555 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde | 1 M after | § 544 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde-Begründung | 2 M after | § 544 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Revisionsfrist | 1 M after | § 548 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 5 | Revisionsbegründung | 2 M after | § 551 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 6 | Revisionserwiderung | 1 M after | § 554 ZPO |  | either |  |  |
+| 7 | Mündliche Verhandlung BGH | 0 M after | § 555 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 8 | BGH-Urteil | 0 M after | § 555 ZPO |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## Berufungsverfahren BGH (Nichtigkeit) · `de.null.bgh`
+
+*Appeal BGH (Nullity)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung BPatG-Urteil | 0 M after | § 110 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Berufungsschrift | 1 M after | § 110 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Berufungsbegründung | 3 M after | § 520 Abs. 2 ZPO i.V.m. § 117 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Berufungserwiderung | 2 M after | § 521 Abs. 2 ZPO i.V.m. § 117 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | Mündliche Verhandlung BGH | 0 M after | § 121 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | BGH-Urteil | 0 M after | § 122 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## EP-Erteilungsverfahren · `epa.grant.exa`
+
+*EP Grant Procedure*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Anmeldung | 0 M after | Art. 75 EPÜ |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Recherchenbericht | 6 M after | Art. 92 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 3 | Veröffentlichung (A1) | 18 M after | Art. 93 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | Prüfungsantrag | 6 M after | R. 70(1) EPÜ |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 5 | Mitteilung nach R. 71(3) | 0 M after | R. 71(3) EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | Zustimmung + Übersetzung | 4 M after | R. 71(3) EPÜ |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 7 | Erteilung (B1) | 0 M after | Art. 97 EPÜ |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## Beschwerdeverfahren BPatG (DPMA) · `dpma.appeal.bpatg`
+
+*Appeal BPatG (against DPMA Decision)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung DPMA-Entscheidung | 0 M after | § 65 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Beschwerde | 1 M after | § 73 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Beschwerdebegründung | 1 M after | § 75 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | Mündliche Verhandlung BPatG | 0 M after | § 78 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 5 | BPatG-Entscheidung | 0 M after | § 78 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren BGH · `dpma.appeal.bgh`
+
+*Legal Appeal BGH*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Zustellung BPatG-Entscheidung | 0 M after | § 100 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 2 | Rechtsbeschwerde | 1 M after | § 100 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Rechtsbeschwerdebegründung | 1 M after | § 102 PatG |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | BGH-Entscheidung | 0 M after | § 100 PatG |  | court-set |  |  |
+
+## Berufungsverfahren Anordnungen · `upc.apl.order`
+
+*Order Appeal (15-day track)*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Anordnung / angegriffene Entscheidung | 0 M after | RoP.220 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 2 | Berufung mit Zulassung | 15 d after | RoP.220.2 |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Antrag auf Ermessensüberprüfung | 15 d after | RoP.220.3 |  | either |  |  |
+| 4 | Berufungsbegründung (Orders Track) | 15 d after | RoP.224.2.b |  | either |  |  |
+| 5 | Anschlussberufung | 15 d after | RoP.237 |  | either |  |  |
+| 6 | Erwiderung Anschlussberufung | 15 d after | RoP.238.2 |  | either |  |  |
+| 7 | Berufungsschrift gegen eine in Regel 220.1(c) genannte Anordnung oder eine in Regel 220.2 oder 221.3 genannte Entscheidung | 15 d after | RoP.224.1(b) | Order referred to in Rule 220.1(c) or a decision referred to in Rule 220.2 or 221.3 | — |  |  |
+| 8 | Berufungsbegründung gegen eine in Regel 220.1(c) genannte Anordnung oder eine in Regel 220.2 oder 221.3 genannte Entscheidung | 15 d after | RoP.224.1(b) | Order referred to in Rule 220.1(c) or a decision referred to in Rule 220.2 or 221.3 | — |  |  |
+
+## Schadensbemessungsverfahren · `upc.dmgs.cfi`
+
+*Damages Determination*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag auf Schadensbemessung | 0 M after | RoP.125 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Klageerwiderung | 2 M after | RoP.137.2 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Replik | 1 M after | RoP.139 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 4 | Duplik | 1 M after | RoP.139 |  | defendant |  |  |
+
+## Bucheinsichtsverfahren · `upc.disc.cfi`
+
+*Lay-open Books / Discovery*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag auf Bucheinsicht | 0 M after | RoP.190 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Klageerwiderung | 2 M after | RoP.142.2 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 3 | Replik | 14 d after | RoP.142.3 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 4 | Duplik | 14 d after | RoP.142.3 |  | defendant |  |  |
+
+## Einstweilige Maßnahmen · `upc.pi.cfi`
+
+*Provisional Measures*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag | 0 M after | RoP.206 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Erwiderung | 0 M after | RoP.211.2 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 3 | Mündliche Verhandlung | 0 M after | RoP.195 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 4 | Mängelbeseitigung Antrag | 14 d after | RoP.207.6.a |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 5 | Beschluss | 0 M after | RoP.211 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 6 | Klage in der Hauptsache erheben | 31 d max 20 WD after | RoP.213 |  | claimant |  |  |
+
+## Schutzschrift · `upc.pl.cfi`
+
+*Protective Letter*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Einreichung der Schutzschrift | 0 M after | RoP.207 |  | defendant |  |  |
+| 2 | Erneuerung der Schutzschrift | 6 M after | RoP.207.9 | Protective Letter | — |  |  |
+
+## Berufungsverfahren Kosten · `upc.apl.cost`
+
+*Cost-Decision Appeal*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Kostenfestsetzungsbeschluss | 0 M after | RoP.221.4 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 2 | Antrag auf Berufungszulassung | 15 d after | RoP.221.1 |  | either |  |  |
+| 3 | Antrag auf Berufungszulassung gegen Kostenentscheidungen | 15 d after | RoP.220.2 | Decision on fixation of costs (Rule 157) | — |  |  |
+
+## Negative Feststellungsklage · `upc.dni.cfi`
+
+*Declaration of Non-Infringement*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Klage auf negative Feststellung der Nichtverletzung | 0 M after | RoP.063 |  | claimant |  |  |
+| 2 | Erwiderung auf die negative Feststellungsklage | 2 M after | RoP.066 | Statement for a declaration of non-infringement | — |  |  |
+| 3 | Replik auf die Erwiderung zur negativen Feststellungsklage | 1 M after | RoP.067 | Defence to the Statement for a declaration of non-infringement | — |  |  |
+| 4 | Duplik zur Replik auf die Erwiderung zur negativen Feststellungsklage | 1 M after | RoP.068 | Reply to the Defence to the Statement for a declaration of non-infringement | — |  |  |
+
+## Überprüfung von EPA-Entscheidungen · `upc.epo.review`
+
+*Review of EPO decisions*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag auf Überprüfung der EPA-Entscheidung | 0 M after | RoP.088 |  | — |  |  |
+| 2 | Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Entscheidung des EPA, mit der ein Antrag auf einheitliche Wirkung zurückgewiesen wurde | 3 w after | RoP.097 | Decision of the EPO not to grant unitary effect | — |  |  |
+
+## Separate Kostenentscheidung · `upc.costs.cfi`
+
+*Separate Cost Decision*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag auf Kostenfestsetzung | 1 M after | RoP.151 |  | claimant |  |  |
+
+## Beweissicherung / saisie · `upc.bsv.cfi`
+
+*Evidence Preservation*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Antrag auf Beweissicherung | 0 M after | RoP.192 |  | court-set |  |  |
+| 2 | Antrag auf Überprüfung der Beweissicherungsanordnung | 30 d after | RoP.197.3 | Execution of measures to preserve evidence | — |  |  |
+| 3 | Beginn des Hauptsacheverfahrens | 31 d max 20 WD after | RoP.198 | Date specified in the Court's order to preserve evidence | — |  |  |
+
+## Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit · `upc.ccr.cfi`
+
+*Counterclaim for Revocation*
+
+| # | Phase / Event | Frist | Rule | Anchor | Seite | R.9.4 | Bedingung |
+|---:|---|---|---|---|---|:---:|---|
+| 1 | Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit | 3 M after | RoP.025 |  | defendant |  |  |
+
+---
+
+**Lesehilfe:**
+- ⤴ Spawn-Marker: event opens a sub-proceeding (e.g. CCR forks revocation track)
+- `with_ccr` = Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit gefilt | `with_amend` = Patentänderungsantrag | `with_cci` = Widerklage auf Verletzung (in rev.cfi)
+- Catalog ist work-in-progress: 7 compound-name rules + Patentänderung-Duplikation noch in m's split-review backlog (m/paliad#149).

frontend/src/client/builder.ts

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import {
   type DeadlineResponse,
   type Side,
 } from "./views/verfahrensablauf-core";
+import { filterByDetailMode, type DetailMode } from "./verfahrensablauf-detail-mode";
 import { mountAddProceedingPicker, type ProceedingTypeMeta } from "./builder-picker";
 import { overlayEventStates, renderTriplet, type ScenarioFlagCatalogEntry } from "./builder-triplet";
 import {
@@ -550,15 +551,32 @@ async function hydrateTriplet(
     return;
   }
   const stichtag = proc.stichtag || state.active?.stichtag || todayISO();
+  // t-paliad-348 — port engine semantics to the Builder triplet calc:
+  //   - `includeOptional` follows the proceeding's detailgrad. The
+  //     "selected" default suppresses optional rules server-side
+  //     (engine drops them); "all_options" opts in so the dimmed
+  //     optional cards can be rendered for the lawyer to opt into.
+  //   - `filterByDetailMode` then runs client-side over what the
+  //     engine emitted, dropping isConditional rows (rules whose
+  //     `trigger_event_id` anchor wasn't supplied) when the lawyer
+  //     is on "selected"/"mandatory_only" — those rules belong to the
+  //     "naked proceeding with options but not always displayed"
+  //     mental model and shouldn't pollute the backbone view.
+  const detailgrad: DetailMode = (proc.detailgrad as DetailMode) || "selected";
   const data: DeadlineResponse | null = await calculateDeadlines({
     proceedingType: meta.code,
     triggerDate: stichtag,
     flags: scenarioFlagsToArray(proc.scenario_flags),
+    includeOptional: detailgrad === "all_options",
   });
   const side: Side = (proc.primary_party as Side) || null;
   const eventsByRule = buildEventsByRule(proc.id);
-  const columnsHtml = data
+  const scenarioFlagsBool = scenarioFlagsToBoolMap(proc.scenario_flags);
-    ? renderColumnsBody(data, { editable: false, side, showDurations: false })
+  const filteredData: DeadlineResponse | null = data
+    ? { ...data, deadlines: filterByDetailMode(data.deadlines, detailgrad, scenarioFlagsBool) }
+    : null;
+  const columnsHtml = filteredData
+    ? renderColumnsBody(filteredData, { editable: false, side, showDurations: false })
     : "";
   host.innerHTML = renderTriplet({
     proceeding: proc,
@@ -927,6 +945,19 @@ function scenarioFlagsToArray(flags: Record<string, unknown>): string[] {
   return out;
 }
 
+// scenarioFlagsToBoolMap narrows the jsonb-shape scenario_flags blob
+// (`{key: true|false|null|other}`) to the strict `Record<string, boolean>`
+// shape filterByDetailMode consumes. The rule:<uuid>=true|false per-rule
+// deviation keys flow through verbatim (their truthiness IS the override
+// signal isRuleSelected reads).
+function scenarioFlagsToBoolMap(flags: Record<string, unknown>): Record<string, boolean> {
+  const out: Record<string, boolean> = {};
+  for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(flags)) {
+    if (typeof v === "boolean") out[k] = v;
+  }
+  return out;
+}
+
 // ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 // Actions
 // ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

frontend/src/client/verfahrensablauf.ts

@@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ const APPEAL_TARGET_PROCEEDINGS = new Set([
   "upc.apl.unified",
 ]);
 
+// hasOptionalOptIn — true when any `rule:<uuid>=true` override exists in
+// the scenarioFlags map (the per-rule "Aufnehmen" deviation written by
+// the detail-mode selection-chip in onRuleSelectionToggle). When set we
+// flip the engine's IncludeOptional on so the chosen optional rules
+// actually reach the response; the engine has no rule:<uuid> awareness
+// of its own so without this layer the pick would silently no-op.
+// (t-paliad-348)
+function hasOptionalOptIn(flags: Record<string, boolean>): boolean {
+  for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(flags)) {
+    if (v === true && k.startsWith("rule:")) return true;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
 function hasAppealTarget(proceedingType: string): boolean {
   return APPEAL_TARGET_PROCEEDINGS.has(proceedingType);
 }
@@ -408,6 +422,16 @@ async function doCalc() {
     perCardChoices,
     includeHidden: showHidden,
     appealTarget,
+    // t-paliad-348 — match the page-level detail mode to the engine's
+    // optional-rule suppression. The engine drops optional rules by
+    // default (IncludeOptional=false); "all_options" mode needs them
+    // back in the response so filterByDetailMode can dim them. We
+    // also opt-in whenever any per-rule `rule:<uuid>=true` deviation
+    // is set on scenarioFlags so an "Aufnehmen"-ed optional in
+    // "selected" mode still surfaces — the engine doesn't read
+    // rule:<uuid> overrides, so without this the user's pick would
+    // silently no-op server-side.
+    includeOptional: detailMode === "all_options" || hasOptionalOptIn(scenarioFlags),
   });
   if (seq !== calcSeq) return;
   if (!data) return;

frontend/src/client/views/verfahrensablauf-core.test.ts

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test";
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, test } from "bun:test";
 import {
   type CalculatedDeadline,
   type DeadlineResponse,
   bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns,
+  calculateDeadlines,
   deadlineCardHtml,
   formatDurationLabel,
   renderColumnsBody,
@@ -773,3 +774,81 @@ describe("stripLeadingDurationFromNotes — render-side dedup (t-paliad-307)", (
       .toBe("Time limit set by the court");
   });
 });
+
+// Pin the engine-options plumbing surface (t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178).
+// calculateDeadlines must forward `includeOptional` and
+// `triggerEventAnchors` straight into the POST body so the Go handler
+// (handleFristenrechnerAPI) can pass them into lp.CalcOptions. If a
+// future refactor drops the fields, the Builder triplet silently
+// reverts to "engine emits optional rules" and the unified
+// /tools/procedures page loses its naked-proceeding default.
+describe("calculateDeadlines — forwards engine options into request body", () => {
+  type CapturedRequest = { url: string; body: Record<string, unknown> };
+  let captured: CapturedRequest | null;
+  let originalFetch: typeof globalThis.fetch;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    captured = null;
+    originalFetch = globalThis.fetch;
+    globalThis.fetch = (async (input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit) => {
+      const body = typeof init?.body === "string" ? JSON.parse(init.body) : {};
+      captured = { url: String(input), body };
+      return new Response(JSON.stringify({
+        proceedingType: "x", proceedingName: "x", triggerDate: "2026-01-01", deadlines: [],
+      }), { status: 200, headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" } });
+    }) as typeof globalThis.fetch;
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    globalThis.fetch = originalFetch;
+  });
+
+  test("default call omits includeOptional and triggerEventAnchors", async () => {
+    await calculateDeadlines({ proceedingType: "upc.inf.cfi", triggerDate: "2026-05-26" });
+    expect(captured).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(captured!.body.includeOptional).toBeUndefined();
+    expect(captured!.body.triggerEventAnchors).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  test("includeOptional=true sends includeOptional: true", async () => {
+    await calculateDeadlines({
+      proceedingType: "upc.inf.cfi",
+      triggerDate: "2026-05-26",
+      includeOptional: true,
+    });
+    expect(captured!.body.includeOptional).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  test("includeOptional=false is omitted (matches engine default)", async () => {
+    await calculateDeadlines({
+      proceedingType: "upc.inf.cfi",
+      triggerDate: "2026-05-26",
+      includeOptional: false,
+    });
+    expect(captured!.body.includeOptional).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  test("triggerEventAnchors forwarded as object", async () => {
+    await calculateDeadlines({
+      proceedingType: "upc.inf.cfi",
+      triggerDate: "2026-05-26",
+      triggerEventAnchors: {
+        "upc.inf.cfi.oral": "2026-09-01",
+        "upc.inf.cfi.decision": "2026-12-15",
+      },
+    });
+    expect(captured!.body.triggerEventAnchors).toEqual({
+      "upc.inf.cfi.oral": "2026-09-01",
+      "upc.inf.cfi.decision": "2026-12-15",
+    });
+  });
+
+  test("empty triggerEventAnchors is omitted", async () => {
+    await calculateDeadlines({
+      proceedingType: "upc.inf.cfi",
+      triggerDate: "2026-05-26",
+      triggerEventAnchors: {},
+    });
+    expect(captured!.body.triggerEventAnchors).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+});

frontend/src/client/views/verfahrensablauf-core.ts

@@ -271,6 +271,12 @@ export interface DeadlineResponse {
   // when the toggle is OFF — so users know there's something to
   // re-surface.
   hiddenCount?: number;
+  // rulesAwaitingAnchor (t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178): number of rules the
+  // engine suppressed because their `trigger_event_id` anchor wasn't
+  // supplied via CalcParams.triggerEventAnchors. Mirrors the Go
+  // Timeline.RulesAwaitingAnchor counter — a single integer surface for
+  // "N rules waiting on an anchor" UI affordances.
+  rulesAwaitingAnchor?: number;
 }
 
 export interface CourtRow {
@@ -311,6 +317,20 @@ export interface CalcParams {
   // endentscheidung | kostenentscheidung | anordnung |
   // schadensbemessung | bucheinsicht.
   appealTarget?: string;
+  // t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178 — surface the engine's two new CalcOptions
+  // axes to the HTTP boundary:
+  //
+  //   includeOptional: when true, the engine returns priority='optional'
+  //     rules in the timeline. Default false matches the engine default
+  //     (mandatory backbone only). The /tools/procedures detailgrad
+  //     toggle ("all_options" mode) drives this to true so the dimmed
+  //     optional cards can be rendered for the lawyer to opt into.
+  //   triggerEventAnchors: per-event-code anchor dates the engine
+  //     consults for rules carrying trigger_event_id. Empty/omitted =
+  //     no anchors → such rules render as IsConditional (the engine
+  //     refuses to fabricate a date off the proceeding's trigger date).
+  includeOptional?: boolean;
+  triggerEventAnchors?: Record<string, string>;
 }
 
 const PARTY_CLASS: Record<string, string> = {
@@ -1118,6 +1138,10 @@ export async function calculateDeadlines(params: CalcParams): Promise<DeadlineRe
           : undefined,
         includeHidden: params.includeHidden ? true : undefined,
         appealTarget: params.appealTarget || undefined,
+        includeOptional: params.includeOptional ? true : undefined,
+        triggerEventAnchors: params.triggerEventAnchors && Object.keys(params.triggerEventAnchors).length > 0
+          ? params.triggerEventAnchors
+          : undefined,
       }),
     });
     if (!resp.ok) {

internal/handlers/fristenrechner.go

@@ -91,6 +91,19 @@ func handleFristenrechnerAPI(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 		// slugs are silently dropped (no filter) so a stale frontend
 		// chip doesn't 400 the request.
 		AppealTarget string `json:"appealTarget,omitempty"`
+		// t-paliad-348 / yoUPC#178 — surface the engine's two new
+		// CalcOptions axes to the HTTP boundary:
+		//
+		//   IncludeOptional: when true, priority='optional' rules
+		//     surface on the timeline. Default false matches the
+		//     engine's default (mandatory backbone only).
+		//   TriggerEventAnchors: per-event-code anchor dates the
+		//     engine consults for rules carrying trigger_event_id.
+		//     When a rule's anchor is absent the engine renders the
+		//     rule as IsConditional rather than fabricating a date
+		//     off the proceeding's trigger date.
+		IncludeOptional     bool              `json:"includeOptional,omitempty"`
+		TriggerEventAnchors map[string]string `json:"triggerEventAnchors,omitempty"`
 	}
 	if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
 		writeJSON(w, http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "Ungültige Anfrage"})
@@ -130,15 +143,17 @@ func handleFristenrechnerAPI(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 	}
 
 	resp, err := dbSvc.fristenrechner.Calculate(r.Context(), req.ProceedingType, req.TriggerDate, services.CalcOptions{
-		PriorityDateStr:  req.PriorityDate,
+		PriorityDateStr:     req.PriorityDate,
-		Flags:            req.Flags,
+		Flags:               req.Flags,
-		AnchorOverrides:  req.AnchorOverrides,
+		AnchorOverrides:     req.AnchorOverrides,
-		CourtID:          req.CourtID,
+		CourtID:             req.CourtID,
-		PerCardAppellant: addendum.PerCardAppellant,
+		PerCardAppellant:    addendum.PerCardAppellant,
-		SkipRules:        addendum.SkipRules,
+		SkipRules:           addendum.SkipRules,
-		IncludeCCRFor:    addendum.IncludeCCRFor,
+		IncludeCCRFor:       addendum.IncludeCCRFor,
-		IncludeHidden:    req.IncludeHidden,
+		IncludeHidden:       req.IncludeHidden,
-		AppealTarget:     req.AppealTarget,
+		AppealTarget:        req.AppealTarget,
+		IncludeOptional:     req.IncludeOptional,
+		TriggerEventAnchors: req.TriggerEventAnchors,
 	})
 	if err != nil {
 		if errors.Is(err, services.ErrUnknownProceedingType) {