Merge: t-paliad-304 — R.109 anchor + columns-view duplicate fix (topo walk + 'both'→ours collapse) (m/paliad#135)

frontend/src/client/views/verfahrensablauf-core.test.ts

@@ -327,6 +327,29 @@ describe("bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns — side+appellant column routing (m/paliad
     expect(rows[0].ours).toHaveLength(0);
   });
 
+  test("side=defendant collapses 'both' rules into ours (no mirror) — m/paliad#135", () => {
+    // When the user has committed to a perspective via `?side=`, the
+    // mirror is visual noise: the same card renders twice on one row,
+    // once in 'Unsere Seite' and once in 'Gegnerseite'. The card's
+    // '↔ beide Seiten' indicator already conveys the both-parties
+    // semantic, so collapsing into ours is sufficient.
+    const rows = bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns(
+      [both("Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung", "2026-04-27")],
+      { side: "defendant" },
+    );
+    expect(rows[0].ours.map((d) => d.name)).toEqual(["Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung"]);
+    expect(rows[0].opponent).toHaveLength(0);
+  });
+
+  test("side=claimant collapses 'both' rules into ours (no mirror) — m/paliad#135", () => {
+    const rows = bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns(
+      [both("Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung", "2026-04-27")],
+      { side: "claimant" },
+    );
+    expect(rows[0].ours.map((d) => d.name)).toEqual(["Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung"]);
+    expect(rows[0].opponent).toHaveLength(0);
+  });
+
   test("rows align across columns by dueDate so same-day events stay on one grid row", () => {
     const sameDate = "2026-07-23";
     const rows = bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns([

frontend/src/client/views/verfahrensablauf-core.ts

@@ -764,7 +764,18 @@ export function bucketDeadlinesIntoColumns(
           // Role-swap collapse: appellant initiated → both → one row
           // in appellant's column. Mirror suppressed.
           row[appellantColumn].push(dl);
+        } else if (userSide !== null) {
+          // Side picked but no appellant axis (first-instance Inf, Rev,
+          // …): the user has committed to a perspective, so the mirror
+          // is visual noise — the same card appears twice on the same
+          // row, once in "Unsere Seite" and once in "Gegnerseite".
+          // Collapse into ours; the "↔ beide Seiten" indicator on the
+          // card already conveys that the rule applies to both parties.
+          // (m/paliad#135 / t-paliad-304)
+          row.ours.push(dl);
         } else {
+          // No perspective picked → keep the legacy mirror so neither
+          // axis is privileged. Pinned by the "default (no opts)" test.
           row.ours.push(dl);
           row.opponent.push(dl);
         }
@@ -799,8 +810,14 @@ export function renderColumnsBody(data: DeadlineResponse, opts: ColumnsBodyOpts
 
   // Collapsed "both" rows lose their mirror tag — there's no longer
   // a sibling row to mirror to, so the "↔ beide Seiten" hint would
-  // be misleading. Keep it for the legacy mirror path.
-  const showMirrorTag = !appellantPinned;
+  // be misleading. Both collapse paths suppress it:
+  //   - appellantPinned: role-swap collapse into appellant's column
+  //   - userSide !== null without appellantPinned: perspective-locked
+  //     collapse into ours (m/paliad#135 / t-paliad-304).
+  // Legacy mirror path (no side, no appellant) keeps the tag — both
+  // sibling rows still render so the tag has a visual referent.
+  const sideCollapse = userSide !== null;
+  const showMirrorTag = !appellantPinned && !sideCollapse;
 
   const renderCell = (items: CalculatedDeadline[]): string => {
     if (items.length === 0) {

pkg/litigationplanner/before_court_set_anchor_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+package litigationplanner
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"errors"
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/google/uuid"
+)
+
+// Regression test for t-paliad-304 / m/paliad#135.
+//
+// Reproduces the R.109.1 / R.109.4 anchor bug on upc.inf.cfi:
+//   - Trigger (Klageerhebung):   parent_id=nil, duration=0,  !IsCourtSet, sequence_order=0
+//   - Translation request:       parent_id=oral, duration=1mo before, sequence_order=45
+//   - Interpreter cost:          parent_id=oral, duration=2w before, sequence_order=46
+//   - Oral hearing:              parent_id=nil, duration=0,  IsCourtSet, sequence_order=50
+//
+// The "before" children are listed BEFORE the oral hearing in sequence
+// order (because chronologically they happen before it). The engine walks
+// rules in sequence_order, so when it processes the translation/
+// interpreter rows, the oral hearing has not yet been processed →
+// courtSet[oral.ID] is not yet set → parentIsCourtSet is false → the
+// engine falls back to the trigger date as the base. Result: the timing=
+// 'before' arithmetic produces 27.04.2026 (1mo before SoC) instead of
+// the conditional-no-date treatment that a court-set parent should
+// trigger.
+//
+// Expected post-fix: translation_request + interpreter_cost render as
+// IsConditional (no concrete date) because their parent's date is
+// court-set and the proceeding does not yet have an explicit override.
+
+// stubCatalog implements lp.Catalog backed by an in-memory rule slice.
+// Only LoadProceeding is needed for the engine path under test; the
+// other interface methods return errors so an unintended call surfaces
+// immediately.
+type stubCatalog struct {
+	pt    ProceedingType
+	rules []Rule
+}
+
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadProceeding(_ context.Context, code string, _ ProjectHint) (*ProceedingType, []Rule, error) {
+	if code != s.pt.Code {
+		return nil, nil, ErrUnknownProceedingType
+	}
+	rules := make([]Rule, len(s.rules))
+	copy(rules, s.rules)
+	pt := s.pt
+	return &pt, rules, nil
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadProceedingByID(_ context.Context, _ int) (*ProceedingType, error) {
+	return nil, errors.New("stubCatalog.LoadProceedingByID: not implemented")
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadRuleByID(_ context.Context, _ string) (*Rule, error) {
+	return nil, errors.New("stubCatalog.LoadRuleByID: not implemented")
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadRuleByCode(_ context.Context, _, _ string) (*Rule, *ProceedingType, error) {
+	return nil, nil, errors.New("stubCatalog.LoadRuleByCode: not implemented")
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadRulesByTriggerEvent(_ context.Context, _ int64) ([]Rule, error) {
+	return nil, nil
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LoadTriggerEventsByIDs(_ context.Context, _ []int64) (map[int64]TriggerEvent, error) {
+	return map[int64]TriggerEvent{}, nil
+}
+func (s *stubCatalog) LookupEvents(_ context.Context, _ EventLookupAxes, _ EventLookupDepth) ([]EventMatch, error) {
+	return nil, nil
+}
+
+// noOpHolidays never adjusts dates — the test fixture doesn't care about
+// weekends or holidays, only about which base date the engine resolves.
+type noOpHolidays struct{}
+
+func (noOpHolidays) IsNonWorkingDay(_ time.Time, _, _ string) bool { return false }
+func (noOpHolidays) AdjustForNonWorkingDays(d time.Time, _, _ string) (time.Time, time.Time, bool) {
+	return d, d, false
+}
+func (noOpHolidays) AdjustForNonWorkingDaysBackward(d time.Time, _, _ string) (time.Time, time.Time, bool) {
+	return d, d, false
+}
+func (noOpHolidays) AdjustForNonWorkingDaysWithReason(d time.Time, _, _ string) (time.Time, time.Time, bool, *AdjustmentReason) {
+	return d, d, false, nil
+}
+
+type fixedCourts struct{}
+
+func (fixedCourts) CountryRegime(_, _, _ string) (string, string, error) {
+	return CountryDE, RegimeUPC, nil
+}
+
+func TestCalculate_BeforeChildOfCourtSetParent_OutOfOrderSequence(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	// proceeding metadata
+	jurisdiction := "UPC"
+	procID := 1
+	pt := ProceedingType{
+		ID:           procID,
+		Code:         "upc.inf.cfi",
+		Name:         "Verletzungsverfahren",
+		NameEN:       "Infringement",
+		Jurisdiction: &jurisdiction,
+		IsActive:     true,
+	}
+
+	mkID := func() uuid.UUID {
+		id, _ := uuid.NewRandom()
+		return id
+	}
+	str := func(s string) *string { return &s }
+	procIDPtr := &procID
+
+	socID := mkID()
+	oralID := mkID()
+	transID := mkID()
+	interpID := mkID()
+
+	socCode := "upc.inf.cfi.soc"
+	oralCode := "upc.inf.cfi.oral"
+	transCode := "upc.inf.cfi.translation_request"
+	interpCode := "upc.inf.cfi.interpreter_cost"
+
+	rules := []Rule{
+		{
+			ID:               socID,
+			ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr,
+			ParentID:         nil,
+			SubmissionCode:   &socCode,
+			Name:             "Klageerhebung",
+			NameEN:           "Statement of Claim",
+			PrimaryParty:     str("claimant"),
+			DurationValue:    0,
+			DurationUnit:     "months",
+			Timing:           str("after"),
+			SequenceOrder:    0,
+			IsCourtSet:       false,
+			IsActive:         true,
+			LifecycleState:   "published",
+			Priority:         "mandatory",
+		},
+		// Translation request: sequence_order BEFORE the oral hearing.
+		// Reproduces the real corpus ordering (DB rows 45 < 50).
+		{
+			ID:               transID,
+			ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr,
+			ParentID:         &oralID,
+			SubmissionCode:   &transCode,
+			Name:             "Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung",
+			NameEN:           "Translation request",
+			PrimaryParty:     str("both"),
+			DurationValue:    1,
+			DurationUnit:     "months",
+			Timing:           str("before"),
+			SequenceOrder:    45,
+			IsCourtSet:       false,
+			IsActive:         true,
+			LifecycleState:   "published",
+			Priority:         "optional",
+		},
+		// Interpreter cost notice: sequence_order BEFORE the oral hearing.
+		{
+			ID:               interpID,
+			ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr,
+			ParentID:         &oralID,
+			SubmissionCode:   &interpCode,
+			Name:             "Mitteilung Dolmetscherkosten",
+			NameEN:           "Interpreter cost notice",
+			PrimaryParty:     str("court"),
+			DurationValue:    2,
+			DurationUnit:     "weeks",
+			Timing:           str("before"),
+			SequenceOrder:    46,
+			IsCourtSet:       false,
+			IsActive:         true,
+			LifecycleState:   "published",
+			Priority:         "mandatory",
+		},
+		// Oral hearing: court-set, no calculable date. Listed AFTER its
+		// "before"-timed children in sequence_order.
+		{
+			ID:               oralID,
+			ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr,
+			ParentID:         nil,
+			SubmissionCode:   &oralCode,
+			Name:             "Mündliche Verhandlung",
+			NameEN:           "Oral hearing",
+			PrimaryParty:     str("court"),
+			DurationValue:    0,
+			DurationUnit:     "months",
+			Timing:           str("after"),
+			SequenceOrder:    50,
+			IsCourtSet:       true,
+			IsActive:         true,
+			LifecycleState:   "published",
+			Priority:         "mandatory",
+		},
+	}
+
+	cat := &stubCatalog{pt: pt, rules: rules}
+
+	timeline, err := Calculate(ctx, "upc.inf.cfi", "2026-05-26", CalcOptions{}, cat, noOpHolidays{}, fixedCourts{})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("Calculate: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	byCode := make(map[string]TimelineEntry, len(timeline.Deadlines))
+	for _, d := range timeline.Deadlines {
+		byCode[d.Code] = d
+	}
+
+	// The trigger event itself is unambiguous.
+	if got := byCode[socCode]; got.DueDate != "2026-05-26" || !got.IsRootEvent {
+		t.Errorf("SoC: DueDate=%q IsRootEvent=%v, want 2026-05-26 + IsRootEvent=true", got.DueDate, got.IsRootEvent)
+	}
+
+	// Oral hearing must surface as IsCourtSet (no date).
+	oral := byCode[oralCode]
+	if oral.DueDate != "" || !oral.IsCourtSet {
+		t.Errorf("oral: DueDate=%q IsCourtSet=%v, want empty + IsCourtSet=true", oral.DueDate, oral.IsCourtSet)
+	}
+
+	// The two "before" children of the court-set oral hearing MUST surface
+	// as conditional rows (no date, no fabricated arithmetic off the
+	// trigger date). The buggy behaviour produces 2026-04-27 and 2026-05-12.
+	trans := byCode[transCode]
+	if trans.DueDate != "" {
+		t.Errorf("translation_request: DueDate=%q, want empty (parent oral is court-set, no anchor known yet)", trans.DueDate)
+	}
+	if !trans.IsConditional && !trans.IsCourtSet {
+		t.Errorf("translation_request: IsConditional=%v IsCourtSet=%v, want at least one true", trans.IsConditional, trans.IsCourtSet)
+	}
+
+	interp := byCode[interpCode]
+	if interp.DueDate != "" {
+		t.Errorf("interpreter_cost: DueDate=%q, want empty (parent oral is court-set, no anchor known yet)", interp.DueDate)
+	}
+	if !interp.IsConditional && !interp.IsCourtSet {
+		t.Errorf("interpreter_cost: IsConditional=%v IsCourtSet=%v, want at least one true", interp.IsConditional, interp.IsCourtSet)
+	}
+}
+
+// TestCalculate_BeforeChildOfCourtSetParent_WithOverride pins the
+// override semantics: when the user supplies an anchor override for
+// the court-set parent, the "before" children should compute against
+// that override date instead of remaining conditional.
+func TestCalculate_BeforeChildOfCourtSetParent_WithOverride(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	jurisdiction := "UPC"
+	procID := 1
+	pt := ProceedingType{
+		ID:           procID,
+		Code:         "upc.inf.cfi",
+		Name:         "Verletzungsverfahren",
+		Jurisdiction: &jurisdiction,
+		IsActive:     true,
+	}
+
+	mkID := func() uuid.UUID {
+		id, _ := uuid.NewRandom()
+		return id
+	}
+	str := func(s string) *string { return &s }
+	procIDPtr := &procID
+
+	socID := mkID()
+	oralID := mkID()
+	transID := mkID()
+
+	socCode := "upc.inf.cfi.soc"
+	oralCode := "upc.inf.cfi.oral"
+	transCode := "upc.inf.cfi.translation_request"
+
+	rules := []Rule{
+		{
+			ID: socID, ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr, ParentID: nil,
+			SubmissionCode: &socCode, Name: "Klageerhebung", NameEN: "SoC",
+			PrimaryParty: str("claimant"), DurationValue: 0, DurationUnit: "months", Timing: str("after"),
+			SequenceOrder: 0, IsActive: true, LifecycleState: "published", Priority: "mandatory",
+		},
+		{
+			ID: transID, ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr, ParentID: &oralID,
+			SubmissionCode: &transCode, Name: "Antrag auf Simultanübersetzung", NameEN: "Translation request",
+			PrimaryParty: str("both"), DurationValue: 1, DurationUnit: "months", Timing: str("before"),
+			SequenceOrder: 45, IsActive: true, LifecycleState: "published", Priority: "optional",
+		},
+		{
+			ID: oralID, ProceedingTypeID: procIDPtr, ParentID: nil,
+			SubmissionCode: &oralCode, Name: "Mündliche Verhandlung", NameEN: "Oral hearing",
+			PrimaryParty: str("court"), DurationValue: 0, DurationUnit: "months", Timing: str("after"),
+			SequenceOrder: 50, IsCourtSet: true, IsActive: true, LifecycleState: "published", Priority: "mandatory",
+		},
+	}
+
+	cat := &stubCatalog{pt: pt, rules: rules}
+
+	// User pins the oral hearing to 2026-10-15.
+	opts := CalcOptions{
+		AnchorOverrides: map[string]string{
+			oralCode: "2026-10-15",
+		},
+	}
+	timeline, err := Calculate(ctx, "upc.inf.cfi", "2026-05-26", opts, cat, noOpHolidays{}, fixedCourts{})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("Calculate: %v", err)
+	}
+
+	byCode := make(map[string]TimelineEntry, len(timeline.Deadlines))
+	for _, d := range timeline.Deadlines {
+		byCode[d.Code] = d
+	}
+
+	if got := byCode[oralCode].DueDate; got != "2026-10-15" {
+		t.Errorf("oral: DueDate=%q, want 2026-10-15 (user override)", got)
+	}
+
+	// 1 month before 2026-10-15 = 2026-09-15
+	if got := byCode[transCode].DueDate; got != "2026-09-15" {
+		t.Errorf("translation_request: DueDate=%q, want 2026-09-15 (1 month before oral override)", got)
+	}
+}

pkg/litigationplanner/engine.go

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import (
 	"context"
 	"encoding/json"
 	"fmt"
+	"sort"
 	"time"
 
 	"github.com/google/uuid"
@@ -183,10 +184,27 @@ func Calculate(
 		return nil, fmt.Errorf("load trigger events for conditional labels: %w", err)
 	}
 
-	// Walk the rule list in sequence_order (already sorted by the
-	// catalog query) and compute each entry, keeping a code→date map so
-	// RelativeTo / parent_id references resolve to the adjusted
-	// predecessor date.
+	// Walk the rule list in TOPOLOGICAL order (parents before children),
+	// not the raw sequence_order order from the catalog. The catalog
+	// returns rules sorted by sequence_order, which is the chronological/
+	// display order. That order is parent-first for the common
+	// timing='after' case but parent-LAST for timing='before' children
+	// (e.g. upc.inf.cfi.translation_request at seq=45 vs its parent
+	// upc.inf.cfi.oral at seq=50 — m/paliad#135). Without topological
+	// ordering the parent-state checks below (courtSet[parent] /
+	// computed[parent_code]) read stale empty maps when a child appears
+	// before its parent, and the engine falls back to the trigger date
+	// → fabricates dates before the SoC.
+	//
+	// Original sequence_order is restored at the end of the walk so the
+	// wire shape and the timeline view's render order stay identical to
+	// the legacy behaviour modulo the bug fix.
+	sequenceIndex := make(map[uuid.UUID]int, len(rules))
+	for i, r := range rules {
+		sequenceIndex[r.ID] = i
+	}
+	walkRules := topoSortByParentDepth(rules)
+
 	computed := make(map[string]time.Time, len(rules))
 	courtSet := make(map[uuid.UUID]bool, len(rules))
 	deadlines := make([]TimelineEntry, 0, len(rules))
@@ -197,7 +215,7 @@ func Calculate(
 	hiddenCount := 0
 	appellantContext := make(map[uuid.UUID]string, len(rules))
 
-	for _, r := range rules {
+	for _, r := range walkRules {
 		// Phase-3 unified gate: evaluate condition_expr (jsonb).
 		// Suppression semantic preserved: when the gate fires false
 		// AND no alt_* values exist, the rule is dropped from the
@@ -554,6 +572,20 @@ func Calculate(
 		deadlines = append(deadlines, d)
 	}
 
+	// Restore sequence_order on the output slice. The compute walk
+	// re-ordered rules topologically (parent-first) so the parent-state
+	// checks resolved correctly; the wire shape and the linear timeline
+	// view both rely on sequence_order being the surface render order.
+	// (m/paliad#135)
+	sort.SliceStable(deadlines, func(i, j int) bool {
+		a, errA := uuid.Parse(deadlines[i].RuleID)
+		b, errB := uuid.Parse(deadlines[j].RuleID)
+		if errA != nil || errB != nil {
+			return false
+		}
+		return sequenceIndex[a] < sequenceIndex[b]
+	})
+
 	// t-paliad-296: within consecutive runs of rules sharing the same
 	// trigger group (parent_id + trigger_event_id), reorder by duration
 	// ascending so optional events following the same anchor render in
@@ -950,3 +982,60 @@ func AllFlagsSet(required []string, set map[string]struct{}) bool {
 func WireFlagsFromPriority(priority string) (isMandatory, isOptional bool) {
 	return wireFlagsFromPriority(priority)
 }
+
+// topoSortByParentDepth returns a copy of `rules` ordered so every rule
+// appears after its parent_id ancestor. Ties (rules at the same depth)
+// preserve their input order — which the catalog returns in
+// sequence_order. Used by Calculate to ensure the parent-state checks
+// (courtSet[parent], computed[parent_code]) see populated entries even
+// when sequence_order lists a "before"-timed child BEFORE its parent
+// (e.g. upc.inf.cfi.translation_request at seq=45 with parent
+// upc.inf.cfi.oral at seq=50 — m/paliad#135).
+//
+// Rules whose parent_id is missing from the rule slice (cross-tree
+// references that the per-proceeding filter dropped) are treated as
+// depth 0 — they walk in their original sequence position.
+//
+// The algorithm is depth-via-memoised-recursion. Cycle protection: a
+// rule chain that revisits a node is broken at depth 0; production
+// data shouldn't contain cycles, but a corrupted catalog mustn't hang
+// the calculator.
+func topoSortByParentDepth(rules []Rule) []Rule {
+	byID := make(map[uuid.UUID]Rule, len(rules))
+	inSlice := make(map[uuid.UUID]bool, len(rules))
+	for _, r := range rules {
+		byID[r.ID] = r
+		inSlice[r.ID] = true
+	}
+
+	depth := make(map[uuid.UUID]int, len(rules))
+	var resolve func(id uuid.UUID, seen map[uuid.UUID]bool) int
+	resolve = func(id uuid.UUID, seen map[uuid.UUID]bool) int {
+		if d, ok := depth[id]; ok {
+			return d
+		}
+		if seen[id] {
+			depth[id] = 0
+			return 0
+		}
+		seen[id] = true
+		r, ok := byID[id]
+		if !ok || r.ParentID == nil || !inSlice[*r.ParentID] {
+			depth[id] = 0
+			return 0
+		}
+		d := resolve(*r.ParentID, seen) + 1
+		depth[id] = d
+		return d
+	}
+	for _, r := range rules {
+		resolve(r.ID, map[uuid.UUID]bool{})
+	}
+
+	out := make([]Rule, len(rules))
+	copy(out, rules)
+	sort.SliceStable(out, func(i, j int) bool {
+		return depth[out[i].ID] < depth[out[j].ID]
+	})
+	return out
+}